Aug 9, 2017 #1 Boiler106 Structural Joined May 9, 2014 Messages 214 Location US ASCE states that rigid roof insulation weighs 1.5 psf per inch of thickness, whereas, polyiso insulation, like Thermax, is < 0.25psf per inch. Is there a reason why ASCE might be so much heavier? Is it assuming some sort of saturation?
ASCE states that rigid roof insulation weighs 1.5 psf per inch of thickness, whereas, polyiso insulation, like Thermax, is < 0.25psf per inch. Is there a reason why ASCE might be so much heavier? Is it assuming some sort of saturation?
Aug 9, 2017 #2 spieng89 Structural Joined Jun 30, 2015 Messages 172 Location US ASCE tabulated weight values are known to be conservative, if you can justify a lesser weight with documentation and you need that extra weight savings then feel free to do so Upvote 0 Downvote
ASCE tabulated weight values are known to be conservative, if you can justify a lesser weight with documentation and you need that extra weight savings then feel free to do so
Aug 9, 2017 #3 SlideRuleEra Structural Joined Jun 2, 2003 Messages 5,527 Location US ASCE is probably referring to older wood fiberboard roof insulation. http://www.SlideRuleEra.net http://www.VacuumTubeEra.net Upvote 0 Downvote
ASCE is probably referring to older wood fiberboard roof insulation. http://www.SlideRuleEra.net http://www.VacuumTubeEra.net
Aug 9, 2017 #4 dik Structural Joined Apr 13, 2001 Messages 26,117 Location CA or just a catch all for any rigid roof insulation. Dik Upvote 0 Downvote
Aug 9, 2017 #5 XR250 Structural Joined Jan 30, 2013 Messages 6,213 Location US Maybe once the membrane is shot, they assume it absorbs water :> Upvote 0 Downvote
Oct 23, 2017 #6 P205 Structural Joined Mar 2, 2008 Messages 136 Location CA I'm looking into this at the moment and stumbled across this thread. I have no problem using the catch-all value for normal gravity design, my issue is with the wind uplift, you would want to use a more accurate value. Upvote 0 Downvote
I'm looking into this at the moment and stumbled across this thread. I have no problem using the catch-all value for normal gravity design, my issue is with the wind uplift, you would want to use a more accurate value.
Oct 23, 2017 #7 IRstuff Aerospace Joined Jun 3, 2002 Messages 44,896 Location US Wood shake roofing comes in around 4 psf wet, and 1.5 psf dry. TTFN (ta ta for now) I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKorP55Aqvgfaq731-376 forum1529 Entire Forum list http://www.eng-tips.com/forumlist.cfm Upvote 0 Downvote
Wood shake roofing comes in around 4 psf wet, and 1.5 psf dry. TTFN (ta ta for now) I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKorP55Aqvgfaq731-376 forum1529 Entire Forum list http://www.eng-tips.com/forumlist.cfm
Oct 23, 2017 #8 DETstru Structural Joined Nov 4, 2009 Messages 395 Location US The ASCE number is way off compared to what is typically used for rigid insulation. Use a value based on whatever product they're specifying. Upvote 0 Downvote
The ASCE number is way off compared to what is typically used for rigid insulation. Use a value based on whatever product they're specifying.
Oct 23, 2017 #9 Ron Structural Joined Sep 24, 1999 Messages 16,336 Location US The 1.5 psf/in is consistent with lightweight insulating concrete. Rigid board insulation is much lighter. Upvote 0 Downvote
The 1.5 psf/in is consistent with lightweight insulating concrete. Rigid board insulation is much lighter.