Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

Rotated Column (90 degree) in Top Level 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

ALK2415

Structural
Sep 15, 2014
278
0
16
IQ
Friend came to me asking for a structural solution for construction mistake, that some column were rotated (90 degrees)
my suggestion was to similar to below drawings. Also we i searched for others solutions found similar techniques
My question is there any other better solution
Would like to hear your opinions (Positive & Negative one) and thanks in advance ..
Note: only four (4Ø16mm form 12Ø16) longitudinal rebars were continuous for bottom level column to the top level column

03_atjxmn.jpg


04_tlpyyi.jpg


other similar analogy solution:-
06_l1cpep.jpg
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

jayrod12
do have information about the shear-studs (threaded bars) capacity
i think whole idea is controlled by Fv of these bars (the blue dashed lines)
also i found similar idea, were they use it to lift bridge girder (below picture)

Also one more question, could we use post-tensioning method to increase the lateral confinement of RC columns ?

1678711102484_2_p3cefs.jpg
 
Hi OP, you may be getting less traffic in this forum versus the main structural forum.

Regarding capacity of the anchors, I actually believe that installing thru-bolts in an existing column is a fools errand. There's usually so much reinforcing at the top of the column that getting them through without damaging reinforcing is near impossible.

I would likely be designing it based on epoxy or mechanical post-installed anchorage requirements.
 
thanks jayrod12
"Installing thru-bolts in an existing column is a fools errand", might be justified for cost effective ?
Don't you think its more effective (stronger) than epoxy or mechanical anchorage ?
 
Probably, but there's no published literature for thru-bolts as far as I'm aware. This conversation has been had a few times, more geared towards masonry but sometimes in concrete, due to the bending of the rod in the hole you end up with some fairly substantial bearing stresses right at the start of the hole.

I'm probably not the guy to wax intellectual on it though. I just know how I'd design it if I were doing it.
 
I think will do it using ABAQUS and see how it goes (up to failure)
Also assuming some tolerance (0.5 mm) between the rod and the drilled hole
just to understand the mechanism.
This site is full with smart ppl, but unfortunately they are non-responsive in FEM when we ask a question
 
OP,
How old is your building?
What is the building a multi story garage?
How many total stories and what floor this column is located on?
Are you in high seismic region?
What are the deminsions of lower and upper columns?
 
Hi Bfstr and thanks for your help
- Building has 4 stories, wu = 12-15 KPa (ultimate loading)
- column dimensions 600x300 mm = (24x12 ") - note both column has same dimensions and only
Note: only four (4Ø16mm form 12Ø16) longitudinal rebars were continuous for bottom level column to the top level column

- this incidence done someone else due to Architectural engineer (allegedly)
- the building is new construction may be one month old
- seismic region is mid-high intensity (S1= 0.1 & Ss= 0.55)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top