Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Rotational restraint of flanges in I beam

Status
Not open for further replies.

JSF10

Aerospace
Jan 8, 2004
7
Dear all, just a quick question.....Basically, I have an I beam, and I want to find the shear buckling stress of the web. I want to model the top and bottom of the WEB with SPRINGS to take the rotational restraint of the FLANGES into account in the FEM program (Nastran). I am trying to calculate the K rotational restraint value to input into Nastran.

It will be in terms of a moment per unit angle of rotation per unit length???.

Any thoughts on this ?

Perhaps the easier way would be to model the flanges as beams connected to a shear web, and that's the way we normally do aircraft structure. But I was wondering if I could do with just springs and would prefer that.

Many thanks for looking into it.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

i'm not entirely sure this'll get you where you want to go. in part you'll need NL and large disp, but i think it is alot of complication without significant improvement in accuracy

in any case, springs connect grids, so the stiffness would need to reflect the grid spacing.
 
AISC has some pretty good formulas (based on some pretty good research) about what the shear buckling stress is for the web of a wide flange.

I would think it would be a lot easier just to look up the research that has already be done rather than try to re-invent the wheel with an FEM analysis.

 
I've waited to see how others respond, but since response seems to be limited, I have a question and a comment:

Question: Why do you prefer to do it this way? Computer resources? easier to copy springs along a length and can place them strategically? I don't think I follow your desire.

Comment:

JSF10 said:
Perhaps the easier way would be to model the flanges as beams connected to a shear web, and that's the way we normally do aircraft structure.

Really? For global models, maybe (I don't model an entire aircraft), but for local models, I usually model any stringers (longerons) and frames (with shear ties) as plates. Then I discreetly model the fasteners using beams and the Huth fastener values. I've seen this approach from several other analysts as well.



Garland E. Borowski, PE
Engineering Manager
Star Aviation
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor