123MB
Electrical
- Apr 25, 2008
- 265
Hi Guys,
I have been struggling with the design of a control cabinet supplied by an isolated inverter so unfortunately I have decided to bother you all!
This appears to be a pretty simple setup... so here goes
The system is supplied from an equipotentially bonded isolated inverter. The inverter has 12VDC input and on the output side of the inverter is a centre tapped secondary with 230VAC L-N and 120VAC L-G (the centre tap is grounded). I am not sure what is happening inside the inverter before the output transformer but it is likely a switching rectifier.
The inverter supplies a control cabinet (class I), which is dedicated to supplying a large baseball scoreboard (class I). The scoreboard is connected L-N (230VAC) and the earth connection on the inverter is connected to the equipotential bonding system which includes extraneous conductive parts of the control cabinet and the scoreboard.
The inverter output is isolated from the DC input and the inverter output has no neutral-earth link. So, theoretically the first insulation fault will not operate any protective devices. Despite this, our local standards prescribe that a residual current device is installed downstream of the inverter - but this RCD will never trip under normal operation.
So, I am confused about the safest way to arrange this setup.
1) What is the reason for the centre tapped transformer in these arrangements? The output is supposed to be floating, but is it really floating? I am confused…
2) If there is an insulation fault, will the centre tap act as a return path for fault current?
3) What is safer in your opinion? An isolated inverter or an inverter with a neutral-earth link and an RCD?
4) Considering the centre tap on the output of the inverter I assume that I will not be able to install a neutral-earth link as it would short one side of the secondary winding? Agree?
5) Generally, with floating supplies at or around 240VAC, can someone explain clearly to me where the danger is in terms of the first fault and the second fault – in terms of the return path for fault current?
Geez this is a bit long. Hopefully someone reads this! Thanks if you got this far
Michael
I have been struggling with the design of a control cabinet supplied by an isolated inverter so unfortunately I have decided to bother you all!
This appears to be a pretty simple setup... so here goes
The system is supplied from an equipotentially bonded isolated inverter. The inverter has 12VDC input and on the output side of the inverter is a centre tapped secondary with 230VAC L-N and 120VAC L-G (the centre tap is grounded). I am not sure what is happening inside the inverter before the output transformer but it is likely a switching rectifier.
The inverter supplies a control cabinet (class I), which is dedicated to supplying a large baseball scoreboard (class I). The scoreboard is connected L-N (230VAC) and the earth connection on the inverter is connected to the equipotential bonding system which includes extraneous conductive parts of the control cabinet and the scoreboard.
The inverter output is isolated from the DC input and the inverter output has no neutral-earth link. So, theoretically the first insulation fault will not operate any protective devices. Despite this, our local standards prescribe that a residual current device is installed downstream of the inverter - but this RCD will never trip under normal operation.
So, I am confused about the safest way to arrange this setup.
1) What is the reason for the centre tapped transformer in these arrangements? The output is supposed to be floating, but is it really floating? I am confused…
2) If there is an insulation fault, will the centre tap act as a return path for fault current?
3) What is safer in your opinion? An isolated inverter or an inverter with a neutral-earth link and an RCD?
4) Considering the centre tap on the output of the inverter I assume that I will not be able to install a neutral-earth link as it would short one side of the secondary winding? Agree?
5) Generally, with floating supplies at or around 240VAC, can someone explain clearly to me where the danger is in terms of the first fault and the second fault – in terms of the return path for fault current?
Geez this is a bit long. Hopefully someone reads this! Thanks if you got this far
Michael