Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Seismic Calculations per ASCE 7-05

Status
Not open for further replies.

Irontrussman

Structural
Aug 29, 2008
10
US
We build mostly R1 and R2 for the New England area and therefore aren't usually concerned about seismic calculations, but now I have a Daycare center going into Massachusetts. I'm trying to correlate the Mass. 780CMR code values with those obtained from ASCE 7-05. My question: in ASCE 7-05, equation 12.8-7, what is the definition of the upper limit of h[sub]n[/sub], the highest level? Is it to the top of the roof ridge or is it to the uppermost diaphragm at which a seismic lateral force is to be applied? And is this the same height required for 780CMR, section 1612.5.1.2.1?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

My take on this is that hn is taken to the center of mass of the highest diaphragm. In your case, a pitched roof, would be about mid height between eave and ridge.
 
ssweetland,
Thanks for your reply.
Are you familiar with 780CMR? My thinking is that h[sub]n[/sub] is to the highest connection of the vertical elements of the seismic resisting system to the diaphragms that comprise and transmit the inertial loads to those vertical elements. A lot of 780CMR looks like it was lifted directly from ASCE7, with some differences on percentage of snow load to be used, and they give values for effective peak velocity-related ground acceleration (A[sub]v[/sub]) and effective peak acceleration (A[sub]a[/sub]) both equal to 0.12g. Are these the same quantities as S[sub]s[/sub] and S[sub]1[/sub] used in ASCE7?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top