Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations pierreick on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Seismic Drift Limits for Crane Buildings

Status
Not open for further replies.

thaidavid40

Structural
Jun 18, 2007
496
I have a project specifications review task for which I have a question regarding seismic drift limits for mill buildings with overhead bridge cranes. My associate insists that h/400 should be applied for the seismic drift limits, just as it would be for wind drift (measured at the crane rail elevation, per AIST TR-13). I say that an earthquake is an ultimate strength event, and this is too strict a limit. I believe that something more like h/60 is more appropriate. One isn't concerned with keeping a straight-tracking rail line during an earthquake. You only want to ensure that in addition to the building not collapsing, that the crane doesn't fall off the rails. This may take a lateral restraint or keeper to accomplish, but you still don't want to apply a limit that is too strict. What is the current thinking on this subject for mill buildings with heavy crane loads (100 tons, or more)?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I'm not an expert on these kinds of building but your logic sounds reasonable to me. It's scary to think of the P-delta effects in play when columns supporting a 100T load are shifting around to the tune of 4". Although I suppose the probability of the max carried load being in place at the same time as the design level earthquake is pretty low.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
 
Thanks for the concurrence. The P-delta effects for this kind of drift are considerable, but that is usually true for all seismic displacements. And as you say, the probability of a rated load during a seismic event is likely low (so low that the load is not usually considered in the seismic mass load cases). Besides, the mass acts as an un-tuned damper anyway. With separate crane columns under the runways, tied back to the building columns, and both anchored with some fixity at the base, that is about all I can do to lessen the moment demands at the column-truss connections.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor