maypot
Electrical
- Feb 25, 2005
- 108
Hi,
We have actually one 400 k W elctric motor 400 V 2955 rpm driving a crusher though a epicyclic gearbox. The motor is diven by a 700 A VFD. The speed of the crusher is controlled by a PLC and the average speed we used to run is around 30 Hz. We actually operates in V/F mode and the torque available at that speed is only 60 % of the rated torque of the motor. I understand that if we switch operation to sensorless vector the tripping will cease.
However, the management is reluctant to operate in this mode claiming that if the crusher is sized, the full torque available at start might damage the gearbox.I undertand that we could limit the maximum torque on the drive.In sensorless vector mode, the drive calculates the torque by actually measuring the output speed and the shaft power.But if the crusher is blocked, the output speed measured will be nearly zero and the drive will actually measure zero torque and continue to drive the load.
I am instead suggesting to implement close loop control through the installation of a PG.
Any comment.
Bob
We have actually one 400 k W elctric motor 400 V 2955 rpm driving a crusher though a epicyclic gearbox. The motor is diven by a 700 A VFD. The speed of the crusher is controlled by a PLC and the average speed we used to run is around 30 Hz. We actually operates in V/F mode and the torque available at that speed is only 60 % of the rated torque of the motor. I understand that if we switch operation to sensorless vector the tripping will cease.
However, the management is reluctant to operate in this mode claiming that if the crusher is sized, the full torque available at start might damage the gearbox.I undertand that we could limit the maximum torque on the drive.In sensorless vector mode, the drive calculates the torque by actually measuring the output speed and the shaft power.But if the crusher is blocked, the output speed measured will be nearly zero and the drive will actually measure zero torque and continue to drive the load.
I am instead suggesting to implement close loop control through the installation of a PG.
Any comment.
Bob