Zachimus
Marine/Ocean
- Jan 16, 2012
- 1
All, I'm a Nav Arch working a PE review course question that MechE's probably know off the bat. A thin-walled steel shaft has a thin-walled inner brass bearing. At initial temperature, the interference is zero. The bearing and shaft are heated. No other forces are applied to the system. The system is free to movements in the axial direction.
First question: Individually, the shaft and bearing are both thin-walled cylinders, but together they could be considered in the thick walled category (t/D>0.1). Is it more appropriate to treat the heated interference fit as a combination of thin-walled cylinders or as a thick-walled cylinder?
So far, I have worked the problem using thin-walled strain formulations. I would appreciate some confirmation if I am applying the correct strain equations and compatibilities.
I established a strain equation for each cylinder. Strain for the outer cylinder was equal to thermal strain plus the circumferential strain (circumferential stress (p*r/t) due to the interference pressure divided by the modulus of elasticity). The strain equation for the inner cylinder was the same, except that the sign for the interference pressure was negative. Material properties were used in each equation to suit.
For compatibility, I said that the change in diameter of the inner bearing must be equal to the change in diameter of the outer shaft.
How say you??
First question: Individually, the shaft and bearing are both thin-walled cylinders, but together they could be considered in the thick walled category (t/D>0.1). Is it more appropriate to treat the heated interference fit as a combination of thin-walled cylinders or as a thick-walled cylinder?
So far, I have worked the problem using thin-walled strain formulations. I would appreciate some confirmation if I am applying the correct strain equations and compatibilities.
I established a strain equation for each cylinder. Strain for the outer cylinder was equal to thermal strain plus the circumferential strain (circumferential stress (p*r/t) due to the interference pressure divided by the modulus of elasticity). The strain equation for the inner cylinder was the same, except that the sign for the interference pressure was negative. Material properties were used in each equation to suit.
For compatibility, I said that the change in diameter of the inner bearing must be equal to the change in diameter of the outer shaft.
How say you??