Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Shear Friction vs Shear Studs

Status
Not open for further replies.

CoreyR

Structural
Joined
Feb 7, 2003
Messages
3
Location
US
I have a question about the connection requirements for shear friction (concrete to concrete) versus shear studs (steel to concrete). Why is it that with shear studs they typically only need to be embeded into the concrete a couple of inches (2" +/-) while the requirements for shear friction connections (per AASHTO) require that hooked dowel bars be embeded a minimum of 6". Aren't they both doing the same job?

Thanks
Corey R.
 
I'm not a bridge engineer (so am not familiar with AASHTO), but I assume the 6" is required to develop the hooked bar. A headed stud is developed by the head.

DaveAtkins
 
It seems to me that the anchors/rebars across a shear-friction interface is mainly used to guaranty the clamping force, and to contribute a shear component (if rebars in angle) against the apllied shear force, while the shear studs are designed with their shear capacity directly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top