Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Shear Wall Maximum Length

Status
Not open for further replies.

elinwood

Structural
Apr 2, 2012
34
I'm a structural engineer by training working on the client's side - We are designing a 40 story structure with 32m x 25m footprint. The building's lateral load system will be a center core with perimeter columns. Our structural engineering consultant is saying:

"the structural opening is needed to keep shear wall length less than 8m. These openings can be door opening but should be 1.2m away from the corner"

I've never heard of this shear wall length criteria and couldn't find any reference for it. I've always thought that the less opening the better - so I asked him what he needs it for. He attached a page from ASCE 7 highlighting the 25% of the Load carried by Moment Frame requirement. Then he mentioned that it's "engineering practice", required to resist seismic load:

The link beam will enter plastic
Then the "wall leg"
Then the frame will provide resistance

Is this common practice ?

I understand if it's because of ductility requirement imposed by ASCE 7-10 as per Table 12.2-1 Section D.

Also, he mentioned that if the wall leg is too long, the rotation capacity is too small, and that in engineering practice the maximum shear wall length is typically 8m. Which rotation capacity is this ?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

There's no code mandated maximum shear wall length that I'm aware of. It sounds as though your engineer is simply trying take steps to ensure a ductile, efficient structure in a seismic region. And, frankly, it sounds as though your structural engineer is pretty sharp.

The dual system shear wall / moment frame thing is a requirement for some buildings in some seismic zones on the U.S. It can be circumvented if one resorts to performance based design I believe.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor