marty007
Mechanical
- Mar 8, 2012
- 622
Hello,
I'm looking into the design of a pressure vessel with a conical bottom head that is supported by a skirt (vessel is not high pressure (<100psi))
The vessel diameter is ~13ft, and the client spec is calling for the skirt diameter to be equal to the main shell diameter, joined at the cone/shell junction. In their specs they are calling for a toriconical head, which I would be happy with, but I'm looking at other options as the sourcing of the toriconical head is proving difficult (cost/delivery/etc...).
In particular I'm looking at ways to build the vessel with a regular cone. I've attached a picture with some diagrams to illustrate the question.
Per Concept 1 in attached picture, if we were to butt weld the cone to the shell, we'd be stuck with having overlapping welds when we join the skirt. Personally I'm not a fan of overlapping welds if it can be avoided.
My main question here revolves around Concept 2. In this arrangement the skirt would be lengthened such that it also acts as the first shell course. Is this weld arrangement the same thing as Fig UW-13.1 sketch f-2 which is not allowed? Sketch f-2 does not appear to indicate the existence of an extended skirt/shell, is this different enough?
I am aware that by not using a toriconical head, I would likely require a stiffening ring in the area of the joint.
Cheers,
I'm looking into the design of a pressure vessel with a conical bottom head that is supported by a skirt (vessel is not high pressure (<100psi))
The vessel diameter is ~13ft, and the client spec is calling for the skirt diameter to be equal to the main shell diameter, joined at the cone/shell junction. In their specs they are calling for a toriconical head, which I would be happy with, but I'm looking at other options as the sourcing of the toriconical head is proving difficult (cost/delivery/etc...).
In particular I'm looking at ways to build the vessel with a regular cone. I've attached a picture with some diagrams to illustrate the question.
Per Concept 1 in attached picture, if we were to butt weld the cone to the shell, we'd be stuck with having overlapping welds when we join the skirt. Personally I'm not a fan of overlapping welds if it can be avoided.
My main question here revolves around Concept 2. In this arrangement the skirt would be lengthened such that it also acts as the first shell course. Is this weld arrangement the same thing as Fig UW-13.1 sketch f-2 which is not allowed? Sketch f-2 does not appear to indicate the existence of an extended skirt/shell, is this different enough?
I am aware that by not using a toriconical head, I would likely require a stiffening ring in the area of the joint.
Cheers,