-
1
- #1
littlebum2002
Mechanical
- Feb 17, 2005
- 7
I am having a minor issue with Mechanica, and I am hoping someone who has had the same issue can share their experience with me.
I have a simple assembly of a solid object sitting on a sheetmetal object. I simplify the sheetmetal part down to a shell pair (not doing so is not an option, the part is too big and too thin), and run the model. Success.
However, the problem is, due to the shell pair my result shows a 1/2 thickness "gap" between the top of the sheetmetal part and the bottom of the solid, since Mechanica shrunk the sheetmetal part down 1/2 thickness on each side of the midsurface.
So, to solve the problem, I went into my assembly, and moved the solid part "into" the sheetmetal part 1/2 thickness, and run the model again, with vastly different results.
Now, my only problem is, I have no idea which one of these represents the true results. Does anyone have some insight into this, as to which of these is actually correct, and why? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!