vonsteimel
Mechanical
- Oct 19, 2010
- 132
Greetings,
I've been looking for a simplistic Ball-Float Shut-off Valve for weeks and cannot find them anywhere. They do make the simple Ball-Float Shut-off Valves but they are much too large for my application. All the Ball-Float Shut-off Valves I could find were designed as a simple shut-off valve to prevent overfilling of large storage tanks. This meant they were all big, as the smallest I could find was still well over an inch in diameter. (A good image of such a valve can be seen attached as "valve_example.jpg")
Ideally, I'd prefer a 1/4" diameter float but I thought the buoyant forces might be too small to allow a proper shut-off therefore we're going to try a 1/2" float ball and reduce the diameter after the float portion of the valve. I have found a reliable source for finely polished, 1/2"Dia hollow aluminum "float" balls. I'm looking to replicate what is seen in "valve_example.jpg" as closely as possible.
The reason I have posted this here is I'm looking for design practices & guidelines for simple ball-float shut-off valves. For instance, what is the best "angle" for the ball seat within the valve body? (see attached image "Design.jpg") -- Also, the fact that no manufacturers of such a valve can be found leads me to believe there may be other considerations hindering the design/production.
Some other considerations are:
- float cannot be placed on an arm to gain leverage (as found in toilets) due to very tight space requirements.
- must be very simple & cheap (ball float only; no piston/plunger)
- may be used-in/exposed-to gasoline, oil and/or alcohol therefore must be highly chemical resistant.
- pressure will not exceed 3 psi;- will only spend approx 5% - 10% of its life submerged; must be corrosion resistant
- gasses must be allowed to enter & exit freely when not in the shut-off position (gas movement will be very slow & not pressurized)
- forces considered are only related to liquid trying to exit the valve; never will liquid be forced into the valve (as there might be in an over-fill protection valve) therefore it is not a design consideration.
I've been looking for a simplistic Ball-Float Shut-off Valve for weeks and cannot find them anywhere. They do make the simple Ball-Float Shut-off Valves but they are much too large for my application. All the Ball-Float Shut-off Valves I could find were designed as a simple shut-off valve to prevent overfilling of large storage tanks. This meant they were all big, as the smallest I could find was still well over an inch in diameter. (A good image of such a valve can be seen attached as "valve_example.jpg")
Ideally, I'd prefer a 1/4" diameter float but I thought the buoyant forces might be too small to allow a proper shut-off therefore we're going to try a 1/2" float ball and reduce the diameter after the float portion of the valve. I have found a reliable source for finely polished, 1/2"Dia hollow aluminum "float" balls. I'm looking to replicate what is seen in "valve_example.jpg" as closely as possible.
The reason I have posted this here is I'm looking for design practices & guidelines for simple ball-float shut-off valves. For instance, what is the best "angle" for the ball seat within the valve body? (see attached image "Design.jpg") -- Also, the fact that no manufacturers of such a valve can be found leads me to believe there may be other considerations hindering the design/production.
Some other considerations are:
- float cannot be placed on an arm to gain leverage (as found in toilets) due to very tight space requirements.
- must be very simple & cheap (ball float only; no piston/plunger)
- may be used-in/exposed-to gasoline, oil and/or alcohol therefore must be highly chemical resistant.
- pressure will not exceed 3 psi;- will only spend approx 5% - 10% of its life submerged; must be corrosion resistant
- gasses must be allowed to enter & exit freely when not in the shut-off position (gas movement will be very slow & not pressurized)
- forces considered are only related to liquid trying to exit the valve; never will liquid be forced into the valve (as there might be in an over-fill protection valve) therefore it is not a design consideration.