leakyseal
Chemical
- Oct 29, 2007
- 27
Hi Folks,
I am having a real Chem Eng 101 Brainfreeze. My embarrassment at having to ask this question, however, is outweighed by my desire to get things straight in my mind.
I have an essentially pure solvent in a storage tank (relatively high boiling, benign solvent, smallish, in plant process tank). The tank is being vented through a condenser by virtue of a downstream blower and I am trying to estimate the solvent load to the condenser.
Sadly quite rusty on equilibria calcs. I approached the calc (baby steps!) like this:
- assume exhausted vapour is always at equilibrium with the liquid (conservative)
- partial pressure of solvent in tank is equal to vapour pressure at tank temp (pp = vp * x, where x is liquid molar fraction of solvent, 1.0 in this case for pure solvent)
- liquid mole fraction y = pp / Ptotal, where Ptotal = 1 atmosphere
So now I know the mole fractions of solvent vapour and air in the exhaust (under equilibrium). Knowing mole weights I can then determine mass fractions, and knowing vapour densities I can then determine volume fractions. I need this because I only know my exhaust flow in volumetric units (scfm).
This part gets a little sketchy because I can only estimate the vapour density with SG based on MW ratios. Also the air density is not known accurately because I don't know the RH. Doesn't matter, I can wave my hands at it and get close enough. So I calculate about 1.2 lb of solvent every minute in my exhaust (2000 SCFM) which seems high to me, conceptually...so I try to corroborate it.
Which is where my confusion starts. I start fiddling with EPA TANKS 4.09, which calculates its vapour density according to:
density = molecular weight * vapour pressure / RT
This produces a much lower density than my prior estimate (like, a couple of orders of magnitude) and hence a lower overall vented mass. I recognize conceptually the validity of the equation (from IG Law etc) but can't figure out where I misstepped in my first approach to get such a different answer. (As I write this I wonder if I just miscalculated the volume fractions...but I checked them several times...but it was late last night...and the calcs are on the desk in my office while I am now sitting at home...but I can't get this off my poor mind!)
Assuming you've slogged through this, any insight?
thanks in advance,
Leaky
I am having a real Chem Eng 101 Brainfreeze. My embarrassment at having to ask this question, however, is outweighed by my desire to get things straight in my mind.
I have an essentially pure solvent in a storage tank (relatively high boiling, benign solvent, smallish, in plant process tank). The tank is being vented through a condenser by virtue of a downstream blower and I am trying to estimate the solvent load to the condenser.
Sadly quite rusty on equilibria calcs. I approached the calc (baby steps!) like this:
- assume exhausted vapour is always at equilibrium with the liquid (conservative)
- partial pressure of solvent in tank is equal to vapour pressure at tank temp (pp = vp * x, where x is liquid molar fraction of solvent, 1.0 in this case for pure solvent)
- liquid mole fraction y = pp / Ptotal, where Ptotal = 1 atmosphere
So now I know the mole fractions of solvent vapour and air in the exhaust (under equilibrium). Knowing mole weights I can then determine mass fractions, and knowing vapour densities I can then determine volume fractions. I need this because I only know my exhaust flow in volumetric units (scfm).
This part gets a little sketchy because I can only estimate the vapour density with SG based on MW ratios. Also the air density is not known accurately because I don't know the RH. Doesn't matter, I can wave my hands at it and get close enough. So I calculate about 1.2 lb of solvent every minute in my exhaust (2000 SCFM) which seems high to me, conceptually...so I try to corroborate it.
Which is where my confusion starts. I start fiddling with EPA TANKS 4.09, which calculates its vapour density according to:
density = molecular weight * vapour pressure / RT
This produces a much lower density than my prior estimate (like, a couple of orders of magnitude) and hence a lower overall vented mass. I recognize conceptually the validity of the equation (from IG Law etc) but can't figure out where I misstepped in my first approach to get such a different answer. (As I write this I wonder if I just miscalculated the volume fractions...but I checked them several times...but it was late last night...and the calcs are on the desk in my office while I am now sitting at home...but I can't get this off my poor mind!)
Assuming you've slogged through this, any insight?
thanks in advance,
Leaky