J1D
Structural
- Feb 22, 2004
- 259
I wonder which radius of gyration of cross-section, rx, ry, or rz, should be used in the calculation per AISC, LRFD for Single-Angle Members?
The question is not answered from the specification. From the Commentary C4 of the specification, it seems to me that since the flexural-torsional buckling strength calculation is approximated by the reduction factor Q, the calculation of Lamda in Eq. 4-1 and 4-2 is from either rx or ry, not rz. However, in Example E4.3 of AISC Manual of Steel Construction (LRFD), rz was explicitly used, which resulted in a design strength of 28.7 kips.
According to the Commentary C4 again, for more conservative values, the strength can be calculated as per Appendix E of AISC LRFD, which directly considers the flexural-torsional buckling (but is more mathematically difficult). Funny thing is that I obtained higher strength from the supposed-to-be-conservative approach. For the single angle in the Example E4.3, the strength I got is then 42 kips.
Any comments?
The question is not answered from the specification. From the Commentary C4 of the specification, it seems to me that since the flexural-torsional buckling strength calculation is approximated by the reduction factor Q, the calculation of Lamda in Eq. 4-1 and 4-2 is from either rx or ry, not rz. However, in Example E4.3 of AISC Manual of Steel Construction (LRFD), rz was explicitly used, which resulted in a design strength of 28.7 kips.
According to the Commentary C4 again, for more conservative values, the strength can be calculated as per Appendix E of AISC LRFD, which directly considers the flexural-torsional buckling (but is more mathematically difficult). Funny thing is that I obtained higher strength from the supposed-to-be-conservative approach. For the single angle in the Example E4.3, the strength I got is then 42 kips.
Any comments?