BasakAbhishek
Mechanical
- Sep 5, 2006
- 33
Hello,
I have to design a heat exchanger with variable load such that the outlet temperature of the shell side (gas at high pressure) is maintained at constant temperature. I have two options:
[Option1] Use single phase water on the tube side and control the shell side outlet temperature by adjusting the pump speed and by a bypass control valve in parallel to the heat exchanger.
[Option2] Use two phase water on the tube side (i.e. with boiling) with the pump maintained at a constant rpm, the varying load resulting in varying dryness fraction in the tube side exit, thus keeping the primary shell side exit at constant temperature.
My question is what is the pros and cons of the either system, in terms of:
(1) Complexity of the system
(2) Chemistry control (will be using DM water, is this an issue with potential scale formation in two phase flow)
(3) Stability issues (noncondensable gases, chf, oscillation flow stability, etc)
Any ideas?
Abhishek
I have to design a heat exchanger with variable load such that the outlet temperature of the shell side (gas at high pressure) is maintained at constant temperature. I have two options:
[Option1] Use single phase water on the tube side and control the shell side outlet temperature by adjusting the pump speed and by a bypass control valve in parallel to the heat exchanger.
[Option2] Use two phase water on the tube side (i.e. with boiling) with the pump maintained at a constant rpm, the varying load resulting in varying dryness fraction in the tube side exit, thus keeping the primary shell side exit at constant temperature.
My question is what is the pros and cons of the either system, in terms of:
(1) Complexity of the system
(2) Chemistry control (will be using DM water, is this an issue with potential scale formation in two phase flow)
(3) Stability issues (noncondensable gases, chf, oscillation flow stability, etc)
Any ideas?
Abhishek