asixth
Structural
- Feb 27, 2008
- 1,333
Hi guys
I have recently moved onto a timber design and want to understand what are the typical sizes that are called up in design.
If I where designing a flexural member with steel, I would size for deflections and strength, starting with the smallest size UB or PFC (depending on detailing and function) and would increase the size until I find a member that satisfies all criteria (i.e 360UB->410UB->460UB).
However with timber, there is so many different sizes and stress grades to select from. What approach should be taken when selecting a timber sizes, I am thinking of sticking to Seasoned Hardwood F17 and only under extreme circumstances will I venture to specialized products for spanning long-distances (such as hyne beams).
Do others have standard timber design procedures or rules of thumb that they like to follow? All comments and tech papers will be appreciated.
I have recently moved onto a timber design and want to understand what are the typical sizes that are called up in design.
If I where designing a flexural member with steel, I would size for deflections and strength, starting with the smallest size UB or PFC (depending on detailing and function) and would increase the size until I find a member that satisfies all criteria (i.e 360UB->410UB->460UB).
However with timber, there is so many different sizes and stress grades to select from. What approach should be taken when selecting a timber sizes, I am thinking of sticking to Seasoned Hardwood F17 and only under extreme circumstances will I venture to specialized products for spanning long-distances (such as hyne beams).
Do others have standard timber design procedures or rules of thumb that they like to follow? All comments and tech papers will be appreciated.