cec17
Structural
- Oct 24, 2014
- 42
I know this has been harped on numerous times, however, many of the threads are old and appear to be based on older load combinations (i.e. 0.6D + 1.0W ; from what I can tell this LC is now 0.6D + 0.6W).
My question is what factor of safety are you using for LRFD and ASD load combinations, and where do you pull this language from in IBC or ASCE7?
I interpreted, based on older threads, that when using "older" service load combinations (i.e. 0.6D + 1.0E) it would be a FS of 1.0 because you've reduced the DL by 0.6. However, the "newer" load combinations also reduce the EQ loads to service level (0.6D + 0.7E) so you've reduced both numerator and denominator. Likewise, when using strength load combinations (i.e. 0.9D + 1.0E) you would be required to have a FS of 1.5 (see example below).
I am thinking that using service load combinations with 0.7E or 0.6W would still require a FS = 1.5, and I should be using 1.5 for BOTH service and strength load combinations. Is this overly conservative?
I know they should, but where in ASCE or IBC does it say that foundations require a factor of safety based on the load combinations used? All I see in 2018 IBC is 1807.2.3 which says retaining walls require FS = 1.5 (it then goes on to contradict itself and say the LC in 1605 shall not apply to this requirement).
Sincerely,
Confused
My question is what factor of safety are you using for LRFD and ASD load combinations, and where do you pull this language from in IBC or ASCE7?
I interpreted, based on older threads, that when using "older" service load combinations (i.e. 0.6D + 1.0E) it would be a FS of 1.0 because you've reduced the DL by 0.6. However, the "newer" load combinations also reduce the EQ loads to service level (0.6D + 0.7E) so you've reduced both numerator and denominator. Likewise, when using strength load combinations (i.e. 0.9D + 1.0E) you would be required to have a FS of 1.5 (see example below).

I am thinking that using service load combinations with 0.7E or 0.6W would still require a FS = 1.5, and I should be using 1.5 for BOTH service and strength load combinations. Is this overly conservative?
I know they should, but where in ASCE or IBC does it say that foundations require a factor of safety based on the load combinations used? All I see in 2018 IBC is 1807.2.3 which says retaining walls require FS = 1.5 (it then goes on to contradict itself and say the LC in 1605 shall not apply to this requirement).
Sincerely,
Confused