sedesigner06
Structural
- Jan 10, 2014
- 58
I am working incorporating the design and detailing requirements of a Special Reinforced Masonry Shear Wall (R=5) for a seismic design category D structure. My only option is to use a SRMSW and cannot use intermediate to relieve the detailing requirements.
I am reading ACI 530-13 7.3.2.6 d stating:
"Shear Reinforcement shall be anchored around vertical reinforcing bars with standard hook" with the commentary noting "This requirement is intended to avoid a splice failure in such reinforcement.
My Questions are:
1) Does anyone have a detail showing this, I have looked at a lot of standard masonry details and never ran across one showing a hook around vertical reinforcing.
2) My interpretation of the commentary is I cannot use development length in any scenario...hooked on both ends and then placed over vertical reinforcing within a bond beam? Seems odd and crowed
I typically use (2) #5 in bond beams at 4'-0'' OC, seems if my interpretation is correct it my be better to use #4's for tighter hooks and less crowding and choke down the spacing if needed to make sure the proper reinforcement ratios are met.
Thanks in advance for any help.
I am reading ACI 530-13 7.3.2.6 d stating:
"Shear Reinforcement shall be anchored around vertical reinforcing bars with standard hook" with the commentary noting "This requirement is intended to avoid a splice failure in such reinforcement.
My Questions are:
1) Does anyone have a detail showing this, I have looked at a lot of standard masonry details and never ran across one showing a hook around vertical reinforcing.
2) My interpretation of the commentary is I cannot use development length in any scenario...hooked on both ends and then placed over vertical reinforcing within a bond beam? Seems odd and crowed
I typically use (2) #5 in bond beams at 4'-0'' OC, seems if my interpretation is correct it my be better to use #4's for tighter hooks and less crowding and choke down the spacing if needed to make sure the proper reinforcement ratios are met.
Thanks in advance for any help.