Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

SS 316 Vs 316L 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

mthakur

Mechanical
May 8, 2003
44
Dear all,
What is the basic difference between SS 316 and 316L interms of their resistance against corrosion in seawater service.
regards
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Is the assebly/component welded?

How hot does it get?

Seems to me that the L grade would have better consistancy part to part since the carbon content is better controlled. However much of the 316 I've seen is dual certed for 316/316L.
 
mthakur,

The Corrosion resistance of SS 316/316L in seawater, mostly pitting/crevice corrosion, is due to the presence of Mo in concentration between 2-3%. The L means that the carbon is below 0.03% and this make difference when you have to weld it. Lower concentration of C means no problems of sensitization and following intergranular corrosion.

hope this help

regards

Strider

 
Well, neither really has much resistance in seawater. If hte seawater is cold and the metal is clean then it might work for a while. Any fouling of crevices will cause rapid pitting.

The real difference between the grades will be if there are any welds. The welds in the straight grade material will have heat affected zones with some grain boundary carbide precipitation and they will be more likely to suffer intergranular corrosion.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Rust never sleeps
Neither should your protection
 

both are not good for seawater service, maybe SS 316L has a little bit more resistance...

Regards

Luis Marques
 
0707

I don't think that it's correct to say that a 316L is no good for a seawater service.
I agrre that under certain condition is not the right selection,stagnant conditions, temperature above a certain limit, but under other condition it could be a good choice.
The final selection of a material is not simply is good or is not good, but it will make the work i'm asking for or not, and a lot of parameters have to be considered: criticality of the service, cost, possibility to inspect...
I think this is the correct approach of a corrosion engineer when selecting a material.

regards

Strider

 
0707

I agree with you that as a general rule 316L could not be the perfect choice, but for certain components, pumps impeller for example, SS 316 can be used.
Seawater service includes so many equipment, components and so on that is not always possible to generalize.
This is my opinion.

regards

Strider

 
Dear All,
Thankf ro your feed back, its is clear that low carbon help in getting better protection beacuse of sensitization issues if exposed to elvetated temperature. My question was if there no such issues with carbide precipitation, will there any preference of using 316L over 316?

regards
 
In reality the distinction between 316/316L is not going to be distict,as often one would end up buying dual certified 316. Even 316 grades quite often contain 0.03% C thanks to AOD and other refining techniques.

" All that is necessary for triumph of evil is that good men do nothing".
Edmund Burke
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor