What do you what to monitor?
MARPOL Annex VI looked at exhaust gas measurements for COX, NOX and SOX and wanted some form of CEMS, a common feature of most recent MEAs (Multilateral Environmental Agreements) but for various reasons stepped back.
As I understand they also looked at satellite plume analysis.
Finally they decided on indirect measurement which meant, for ship's engines, characterising and certifying the enines so they could compute COX and NOX based on fuel used and engine certification and SOX based on fuel used and %mass sulphur in the fuel.
Fair enough but good and suitable inline fuel sulphur measurement was also out. So they rely on lab analysis for the fuel sulphur content (and density because the fuel used is measured by volume and they need mass).
I suspect it won't be long before they impose the inline sulphur and density measurement solution because they now have or almost have suitable instruments and the method adopted isn't too clever.
CEMS is necessary not just for observational monitoring (collecting data on emissions so as to know where you start from and how it changes over time and how effective legislation is) but also as part of delivering on the other key treaty success factors, implementation, verification and enforcement.
But, I'll be watching here to see if anyone comes up with suitable instruments for direct measurement because if they do then that might be how the IMO reacts on MARPOL.
By the way, Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems instruments should be accurate and tamper proof.... not always easy..... but verification is one of those key factors in successful treaties and if you can't guarantee the instruments you don't have verification.
JMW