Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Stainless Steel minimum bottom course thickness

Status
Not open for further replies.

pbc825

Structural
May 21, 2013
103
I'm working on an API 650 tank being fabricated from A240-316L plate with 18' diameter. Design thickness of the bottom course is 0.0835" and API clause 5.6.1.1 recommends a minimum shell thickness of 1/4" for the first course and 3/16" for the upper courses. Appendix S does not note minimum design thickness. Vendor is proposing to make all courses (bottom included) from 3/16" plate. I'm in favor, but I want to ensure I'm not breaking any API 650 rules by doing so. I'm also interested in any commentary (philosophical or otherwise) regarding minimum API 650 thicknesses and why in some instances the bottom course is recommended to be thicker that the top courses. Does it have anything to do with nozzle loads from tank deflections and rigid piping on the lower course?

Thank you in advance for any replies.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

See S.3.2.1.1, last clause "Note 4 does not apply", and it is that Note 4 that specified the 0.25" first ring thickness. So the 0.1875" is in compliance with API-650.

I don't know the exact reasoning for the thickness requirements. It is a more critical area due to bending at the restrained joint, due to nozzles, due to anchor chair attachments, due to water corrosion, etc., so the extra thickness isn't a bad idea there.
 
Very good JStephan. Thank you for your help. It is much appreciated.

PC
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor