Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

static mixer

rika kose

Chemical
Jun 11, 2019
70
We got two quotes for a static mixer.
The same dimention,
a, is PTFE coating, 3 elements, 0.25 bar pressure drop
b, is ETFE coating, 0.35 bar pressure drop with 6 elements.

Option b is 5 times more expansive.

IS the ETFE so much more expansive?
based on what we should make the decision?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

What is being mixed? More details; better answer.
Two liquids.
liquid 1. viscosity is 100cP flow = 95m3/h, liquid 2 viscosity is 1.4 cP flow flow is around 2 m3/h. solubility of liquid 2 in liquid 1 around 10% wt
 
based on what we should make the decision?
On homogenity of the mix downstream.
The cost of the most expensive static mixer is negligible compared to the risk of potential profit losses. A static mixer isn't a compressor, reactor, or furnace. It's a small, easy-to-manufacture piping element that someone could even make themselves from a sheet of plastic in a carport with a hand tool in about an hour.
How are you going to prove that both of these mixers provide the same level of homogeneity? Why would you score them based on cost alone (assuming that pressure drop results in processing costs)?
Pricing isn't a simple or obvious issue, especially in a science-intensive field like fluid mixing.
I'd guess the first one was designed using CFD modeling, while the second one relied on pilot testing, which is far more expensive.
 
Last edited:
More elements with slightly more pressure drop infers that the mixing will be more through.
Do you really want to use a coated one?
Are you injecting liquid 2 through a centerline quill?
 
shvet and Ed align with my thinking. Option B mixes better. What is the cost of failure? Is a coating really needed, or will SS be okay? IIRC, standard MOC in static mixers is SS.
 
Ask them about flow turndown range - that should also be weighed in for selection criteria. At low flow, mixing will be more difficult.
 
Hi,
Probably good to read:

Agree with comments above, what is important is the end result (good mixing) at the operating point.

You did not answer the reason why the static mixer is coated. Are your materials corrosive?

note : You may have 2 different types of SM in the offers,
the first being LPD (Low pressure drop), the second being ISG (interfacial surface generator)
https://www.staticmixers.com/models#isg ,
construction wise this will explain the cost difference.
base of design:
2nd and third links are similar , except the calligraphy .

Pierre
 
Last edited:
Given 7kPa per 1 element I bet on those are not coated with plastic but made of instead as buckling is not an issue. The perforated plastic ~1/4" sheets squeezed with plastic spools by long studs and inserted in a piping straight run.

Assuming the turndown 1:2 the pressure drop per element is 1.5 kPa. Wondering how can 2nd liquid dispersing be possible at 1.5 kPa? Given the 1st liquid viscosity is 100 times higher than water one how low the LL surface tension should be to provide any dispersing of any degree at 1.5 kPa? Is it physically achievable?

1,5 kPa is the pressure a cup of espresso (total 150g) with bottom diameter 5mm puts on a table desk.

update&offtop
I love @rika kose whose topics have always been being so immense, so impressive. So contrast to the topics nearby: "10 or 11 cfps is preferred?" or "should I pick up globe or gate valve?". No, @rika kose is not like that.

if a liquid then 100 times denser than water
if a mixing then 1:50 and in a pipe
if a dispersing then 1psi of pressure drop
if a fluid than a highly corrosive one and corrosive-immune fluoroplastics
if a price then 6 times difference

That is the scale, the real chem engineering challenges! Not a rat races at the neighbourhood. The brain is emerging from a rut, gears between the ears start turning and squeaking. Awesome. More such please.
But are you sure that @rika kose is a human, not an AI conducting a behavioristic experiment?
 
Last edited:

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor