Yes, the curve limit is defined but the operational limit (Anti-surge and stonewall) was not shown in the curve. I thought at least the anti-surge limit should be defined in the curve. Is not the anti-surge limit important for small compressors?
Response: The anti-surge line is not showed for fixed speed machine. The controller monitors the deviation to surge flow versus fixed point (surge flow) on the left. The curve limits are the operational limits, except for the surge line where a control line in between is applied for anti-surge control. But here again this is fixed speed machine so there is no such a line to show. Moreover even in variable speed machine, it is not custom to show the control line. Roughly it is known that this line is situated at 10% from surge line.
It does not matter for the size as far as anti-surge control is concerned.
I searched for the "Axial thrust " calculation but I could not find it in the vendor documents. I am not a mechanical engineer so I do not have any idea how this calculation can help me to determine the compressor trip at the stonewall.
There is no compressor trip at stonewall. Never heard of. Thrust calculations will tell which operating scenario have been considered for sizing the thrust bearing, including choke limit if the job has been done to good standard.
Big compressors always have high bearing and vibration trips.
Not true. Many big operator wants no trip on bearing's temperatures for example because spurious trips can be very costly.
To protect the system, I need to find a compressor trip function otherwise the only safeguard will be the operator act.
I have the impression that a fixed speed compressor has been selected and it is lacking operating flexibility. If that is the case, I doubt there is a quick fix.
Do you mean that the compressor is not damaged if it is working at stonewall condition? As operation in the stonewall condition will increase the compressor vibration and high bearing temperature so if there is no auto trip function, how long can the compressor work in this condition before operator decide to trip the system?
If you are operating within the performance envelope (in this case, it is a fixed speed curve) provided by the manufacturer and supposedly the design has been executed properly by a knowledgeable vendor, and the machine is not deteriorated from its clean state, then I do not see why not operate at the end of the curve (choke), except like I said incur a drop of performance and poor efficiency continuous operation. If you process conditions are upset or off specification then in my opinion it would be another problem to address.