jgailla
Geotechnical
- Dec 23, 2004
- 896
We are working on a project in north Florida where an existing 18" storm pipe has to be diverted about 10' to go underneath a proposed pedestrian tunnel.
The standard approach of using a two or more smaller pipes to carry flow does not seem to apply, as there will be many days or weeks during the year when there will be no flow.
Therefore suspended solids will drop out of the stagnant stormwater in the siphon during periods of no rain.
Our present approach is to provide one 18" storm pipe, drop at 45 degrees to another manhole to help mitigate erosion caused by a 10 foot straight drop, run the pipe at 2 percent to get solids moving even under very low flow events, and provide a 1 foot deep sump on the downstream end to catch solids.
We would specify the sump to be pumped out each year in October and March, just before and just after the rainy season.
Does anyone have any alternate ideas?
Are there problems with this approach?
The standard approach of using a two or more smaller pipes to carry flow does not seem to apply, as there will be many days or weeks during the year when there will be no flow.
Therefore suspended solids will drop out of the stagnant stormwater in the siphon during periods of no rain.
Our present approach is to provide one 18" storm pipe, drop at 45 degrees to another manhole to help mitigate erosion caused by a 10 foot straight drop, run the pipe at 2 percent to get solids moving even under very low flow events, and provide a 1 foot deep sump on the downstream end to catch solids.
We would specify the sump to be pumped out each year in October and March, just before and just after the rainy season.
Does anyone have any alternate ideas?
Are there problems with this approach?