Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Stormwater Ditch modeling

Status
Not open for further replies.

JTugwell

Civil/Environmental
Sep 3, 2014
5
Hello,

I am currently designing a stormwater retention system for a 257 acre surface mining area. I have to provide adequate capacity to contain a 25 year event (8.5 inches in 24 hours). I have the ability to construct a drainage ditch around the perimeter of the mining area which would route drainage to an area that has been previously mined. This ditch will be approximaely 8500 feet long, and I am concerned that I am not modeling it correctly.

What I have done in the past is break the mining area up in to smaller watersheds by looking at the topographic data and creating a subcatchment for each. I will then have the catchment report to a reach. Each reach will then input into the next successive reach until I have the entire watershed accounted for. I am attempting to model a ditch that is receiving input along its entire length. I am sure there is a better way to do this and was hoping someone could help me out here. I have read something in the user manual about including the ditch as a channel flow segment in the subcatchment modeling, but I don't understand how that works. Any assistance will be greatly appreciated.

-Jonathan
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Since you are feeding the channel at multiple points, you will need to use multiple reach segments, exactly as you have done. Modeling the reach as a flow segment within a subcatchment would only apply if the reach were contained within a single subcatchment.

For further details please see

Peter Smart
HydroCAD Software
 
Would there be any benefit to modeling the entire 257 acre area as one subcatchment, and then including the ditch as a flow segment within? Or would I find more accurate results using the method described previously?
 
Your approach (multiple reaches and subcats) is probably more accurate. I would try it both ways and compare the results.

Peter Smart
HydroCAD Software
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor