Guest102023
Materials
- Feb 11, 2010
- 1,523
I attach a few photos of a failed refinery reboiler tube that has me puzzled.
Description: ¾"Ø x 16GA (0.062"), arc welded 304L. Chemical analysis of base metal is in spec, although P is surprisingly high at 0.034%.
Service: Tubeside steam, shell side cat cracker feed (heavy hydrocarbons). Chloride ions reported <10 ppm.
My first thought on seeing the double track on the OD was 'selective corrosion of HAZ', but the microscopy showed different.
- base metal looks heavily sensitized; possible sigma phase. Despite carbon of only 0.02%.
- failure was by a single pit originating on the STEAM side (NOTE: and adjacent tube failed by an apparently entirely different mechanism: 50% lack of fusion in the factory long seam followed by high cycle fatigue).
- the groove on the OD looks less like corrosion pitting and more like a dent.
- aggressive corrosion from the steam side but only at a single pit
Any thoughts?
"If you don't have time to do the job right the first time, when are you going to find time to repair it?"
Description: ¾"Ø x 16GA (0.062"), arc welded 304L. Chemical analysis of base metal is in spec, although P is surprisingly high at 0.034%.
Service: Tubeside steam, shell side cat cracker feed (heavy hydrocarbons). Chloride ions reported <10 ppm.
My first thought on seeing the double track on the OD was 'selective corrosion of HAZ', but the microscopy showed different.
- base metal looks heavily sensitized; possible sigma phase. Despite carbon of only 0.02%.
- failure was by a single pit originating on the STEAM side (NOTE: and adjacent tube failed by an apparently entirely different mechanism: 50% lack of fusion in the factory long seam followed by high cycle fatigue).
- the groove on the OD looks less like corrosion pitting and more like a dent.
- aggressive corrosion from the steam side but only at a single pit
Any thoughts?
"If you don't have time to do the job right the first time, when are you going to find time to repair it?"