kyong
Mechanical
- Aug 15, 2001
- 73
I am very wondering why heat exchanger design methods don't consider shell thickness in view of longitudinal stress(compression or tension) due to thermal differential expansion of fixed tubesheet type heat exchangers.
I looked into K.A.G. Miller's method to design fixed tubesheet and ASME Section VIII-Div 1 App.AA.
Miller's method uses thickness of shell and properties of shell material to calculate longtudinal stress of tubes and stress in tubesheet. But it doesn't mention about shell stress.
On the other hand, ASME method does calculate shell stress , i.e., membrane stress due to interaction with tubesheet and bending stress due to the same one. It donesn't provide longtudinal stress of shell. Is this, by any chance, because longtudinal stress is not important or not necessary to calculate?
Does any one have any idea about this issue?
kyong
I looked into K.A.G. Miller's method to design fixed tubesheet and ASME Section VIII-Div 1 App.AA.
Miller's method uses thickness of shell and properties of shell material to calculate longtudinal stress of tubes and stress in tubesheet. But it doesn't mention about shell stress.
On the other hand, ASME method does calculate shell stress , i.e., membrane stress due to interaction with tubesheet and bending stress due to the same one. It donesn't provide longtudinal stress of shell. Is this, by any chance, because longtudinal stress is not important or not necessary to calculate?
Does any one have any idea about this issue?
kyong