woody1235
Structural
- Oct 29, 2008
- 19
Good Morning!
I am working on an existing structural steel framed building that has been is service for about 25 years. Since the owners are adding some heavier roof mounted AHUs, I asked that the affected existing girder to column connections (welded to column, bolted to beam web) be exposed and inspected to verify condition and bolt configuration versus the original design drawings.
These bolted connections were originally designed as A325 bearing, snug tight.
At 2 locations, the inspector found 1/8" to 3/16" gaps between the connection angle and the bolted girder web, with loose washers. (at one location the nuts had been tack welded). It appears they were never brought up tight during erection.
I don't believe trying to re-tighten them is an option; the girder is under heavy load, and I don't think you can re-tighten A325s.
Does anybody know of an acceptance criteria for this kind of condition, or how to determine if the capcity is actually decreased?
Thanks!
I am working on an existing structural steel framed building that has been is service for about 25 years. Since the owners are adding some heavier roof mounted AHUs, I asked that the affected existing girder to column connections (welded to column, bolted to beam web) be exposed and inspected to verify condition and bolt configuration versus the original design drawings.
These bolted connections were originally designed as A325 bearing, snug tight.
At 2 locations, the inspector found 1/8" to 3/16" gaps between the connection angle and the bolted girder web, with loose washers. (at one location the nuts had been tack welded). It appears they were never brought up tight during erection.
I don't believe trying to re-tighten them is an option; the girder is under heavy load, and I don't think you can re-tighten A325s.
Does anybody know of an acceptance criteria for this kind of condition, or how to determine if the capcity is actually decreased?
Thanks!