dgowans
Mechanical
- Oct 12, 2004
- 680
SW2006, SP2.0
I have a question regarding one of the options for interference detection, specifically the option to Treat sub-assemblies as components.
I have an assembly which consists of several sub-assemblies and wish to check for interference between 2 of the sub-assemblies. These sub-assemblies consist of sheet metal parts w/ PEM hardware, so there is interference within each sub-assembly. I toggled on the Treat sub-assemblies as components option and performed my check. I was greeted with a whole pile of interferences which were the intentional interference between the PEM components and their respective mounting holes. The interferences reported are entirely within one of the two sub-assemblies I wanted
to check.
From the help:
Treat subassemblies as components.
When selected, sub-assemblies are treated as single components, so interferences between a sub-assembly's components are not reported.
Am I missing how this option works or is it not working? I thought this was fairly intuitive.....
Thanks,
Dave Gowans
I have a question regarding one of the options for interference detection, specifically the option to Treat sub-assemblies as components.
I have an assembly which consists of several sub-assemblies and wish to check for interference between 2 of the sub-assemblies. These sub-assemblies consist of sheet metal parts w/ PEM hardware, so there is interference within each sub-assembly. I toggled on the Treat sub-assemblies as components option and performed my check. I was greeted with a whole pile of interferences which were the intentional interference between the PEM components and their respective mounting holes. The interferences reported are entirely within one of the two sub-assemblies I wanted
to check.
From the help:
Treat subassemblies as components.
When selected, sub-assemblies are treated as single components, so interferences between a sub-assembly's components are not reported.
Am I missing how this option works or is it not working? I thought this was fairly intuitive.....
Thanks,
Dave Gowans