mooseye
Industrial
- Sep 30, 2008
- 2
I know this has been gone over before.
I have recently had a piping failure with an acid system for ph level control. The piping is 316 stainless. The original piping appeared to be 1/2" socket weld but had a repair/replacement with threaded ball valves which were subsequently welded over the threads.
The ball valves had begun to leak at the stem from ball deterioration.
The line was repaired/replaced back to the last socket weld ninety using 304 pipe and fittings.
This portion of the line had a catastrophic failure within 48 hours. The 304 pipe was eaten through in 3 places and one 4" nipple had split.
This system uses a small diaphragm pump to move the 98% sulphuric acid about 40 feet to a 3" PVC riser
Prior to the repair, the line was flushed with city water for worker safety. I am curious as to whether the flush water may have accelerated the corrosion when the system was placed back in service. I know the 304 was probably a bad choice to start with. The original 316 does not seem to be affected.
Another question. What effect would possible internal sugaring of the pipe wall have on the corrosive action?
I have recently had a piping failure with an acid system for ph level control. The piping is 316 stainless. The original piping appeared to be 1/2" socket weld but had a repair/replacement with threaded ball valves which were subsequently welded over the threads.
The ball valves had begun to leak at the stem from ball deterioration.
The line was repaired/replaced back to the last socket weld ninety using 304 pipe and fittings.
This portion of the line had a catastrophic failure within 48 hours. The 304 pipe was eaten through in 3 places and one 4" nipple had split.
This system uses a small diaphragm pump to move the 98% sulphuric acid about 40 feet to a 3" PVC riser
Prior to the repair, the line was flushed with city water for worker safety. I am curious as to whether the flush water may have accelerated the corrosion when the system was placed back in service. I know the 304 was probably a bad choice to start with. The original 316 does not seem to be affected.
Another question. What effect would possible internal sugaring of the pipe wall have on the corrosive action?