Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

Superchilling/cooling castings and metals 5

Status
Not open for further replies.

wontweldcantweld

Mechanical
Feb 1, 2015
10
0
0
GB
Hi Everyone!

First time I've posted here, but I'm struggling to find any information regarding the supercooling (also known as superchilling)of metals and castings, particularly the effect on the materials grain structure and how it affects it mechanical properties. I've tried looking looking on the internet and in various books but there seems to be no information on the subject.

I would appreciate any information or help with this, cheers!

 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Perhaps using the term subcooling will help.
There is a lot of work out there regarding the impact of accelerating the cooling rate of castings.
We used to use cast iron chills in molds to get preferential cooling patterns in high Cr white cast iron.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, Plymouth Tube
 
There is quite a lot of information on the internet for "cryogenic treatment" of metal. My guess is this is what you may be looking for versus adding chills to a casting mold to locally expedite cooling of the casting. You will find a wide variety of opinions on the benefits of doing cryogenic treatment for austenitic stainless steels.
 
There is a HUGE amount of really spectacular BS available on the subject of Deep Cryogenic Treatment (DCT) of metals.

Clearly there are some applications where there are explicable and significant benefits to be obtained by using DCT but unhappily the industry seems to be populated by a large number of 'Snake Oil' salesmen who make preposterous claims that will never be substantiated.

It is clear that DCT an be beneficial in eliminating problems in tool steels caused by residual austenite and that in some cases can cause the precipitation of eta carbides but may of the claims beyond this seem to me to be pure BS,

Many of the claims made just don't stand up to any sensible asnalysis and few if any results are ever published.

Good Luck.
 
Dr. Randall Barron of Louisiana Tech Is generally credited as the scientific authority who ”proved the value of cryogenics”.

I have read some of his work. It has been a while but, as I recall, he was paid to run some tests for a cryogenics company. His results stated that sometimes something happened. I remember being impressed by his science and rather appalled at how it was represented by the cryogenics people.


Thomas J. Walz
Carbide Processors, Inc.

Good engineering starts with a Grainger Catalog.
 
Just to let everyone know I passed the assignment on super cooling, and thanks to everyone for giving me advice how little or large! It seems its quite a large topic, but very little is known about it at the level I'm studying at.

Cheers Maui, I've had a quick look at that book and it looks right up my street!

Thanks again to everyone, greatly appreciated!
 
Research on Deep Cryogenic Treatment (DCT)of materials in general is available at This is site set up by the Cryogenic Society of America. I also suggest that you look in Volume 4A of ASM Handbook. There is an article there that differentiates between cold treatment and DCT. Read the research.

DCT has been shown to create substantial increases in wear resistance and fatigue life in many metals, carbide tooling and in some plastics. Again, read the research. Yes, it can convert retained austenite to martensite and in some steels it does cause small carbides to precipitate. We are finding that it is also making changes in the crystal lattice structure. This is why it has an affect on non ferrous metals and carbides. This has confused many metallurgists who only look at grain structure. The idea that the austenite/martensite shift is the only thing happening ought to look at the huge increase in the life of cast iron brake rotors that are treated. They have a pearlitic micro-structure that has no retained austenite.

DCT has many uses in industry. Yes, many wild claims have been made about it. But many claims that sound wild are true. Those "doubters" who dismiss DCT without reading the research should be ashamed to call themselves engineers and scientists.
Again, read the research.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top