hansbenford
Civil/Environmental
- Dec 13, 2007
- 11
I am running a model with a year of rain data. It rained 55.74 inches in that year.
My subcatchment is 0.468 acres of 100% impervious area. For whatever reason, the rain turns out to be 55.621 inches which i am assuming comes from the change that SWMM does from volume input to intensity which is what it uses for calcs.
No big deal there. The runoff is in the 55 inch range as well as expected.
It travels to a storage unit which is my "infiltration trench". I have two outlets from the trench: 1) an infiltration rating curve starting from the bottom of the trench. 2)a rating curve at the overflow level.
If i sum the total flows from these two, they come out right around 55 inches over the watershed.
So far so good....
When I change the size of the subctachment to more appropriately fit the trench, the total of the two flows decreases dramatically. I am decreasing the area of the subcatchment a lot (0.0213 acres).
In both cases I am converting the flows from CFS to inches over the respective watershed.
For the smaller area I am still seeing 55.621 inches of rain running off, but the sum of the infiltration and overflow at the trench turns out to be 46.18 inches.
I have no explanation and have tried to find the cause to no avail. Am I at some threshold in SWMM? Is it not capable of modeling such a small area?
My subcatchment is 0.468 acres of 100% impervious area. For whatever reason, the rain turns out to be 55.621 inches which i am assuming comes from the change that SWMM does from volume input to intensity which is what it uses for calcs.
No big deal there. The runoff is in the 55 inch range as well as expected.
It travels to a storage unit which is my "infiltration trench". I have two outlets from the trench: 1) an infiltration rating curve starting from the bottom of the trench. 2)a rating curve at the overflow level.
If i sum the total flows from these two, they come out right around 55 inches over the watershed.
So far so good....
When I change the size of the subctachment to more appropriately fit the trench, the total of the two flows decreases dramatically. I am decreasing the area of the subcatchment a lot (0.0213 acres).
In both cases I am converting the flows from CFS to inches over the respective watershed.
For the smaller area I am still seeing 55.621 inches of rain running off, but the sum of the infiltration and overflow at the trench turns out to be 46.18 inches.
I have no explanation and have tried to find the cause to no avail. Am I at some threshold in SWMM? Is it not capable of modeling such a small area?