Inlander
I've designed a couple dozen similar foundations and each time it is different depending on the soils.
to consider:
Excavation may cause GLOBAL slope instability. The Geotech should run a slope stability analysis.
Excavation may cause LOCAL slope instability. Layback cut may not be feasible.
IF the slope may be GLOBALLY stable during excavation SHORT TERM shoring for worker safety (micropiles etc) may be apprpriate. IF GLOBALLY unstable tiebacks (soil nailing) may be appropriate. I have used permanent soil nailing with a shotcrete wall for permanent support. The foundation wall in front is isolated and non-retaining.
I just finished an 18 ft wall. The slope was determined to be stable globally so we did temporary micropile curtain wall (tiebacks would have been in the property next door). My structure is pretty similar to yours. But, I didn't do a shear key because the extra depth of the cut for the shear key really affected the shoring. Instead I did a footing that acted like a lateral beam and transfered loads to footings on the side that extended outside the building so they were loaded with soil. This was needed anyway for the top and mid-wall contributions.
One thing that happens to me every time I design one of these is that I get fixated on the larger retaining wall and forget, for a bit, that the side walls still have significant retaining and are, sometimes, trickier to design. Cantilevered side walls sometimes deflect too much for a building. So, I try and find locations for buttresses or counterforts. Sometimes we rely on passive restraint on the opposite side and transfer loads through framing. But, you can cross the line where that is appropriate at some point. And, often the restraint is questionable because of adjacent construction
This is a BIG design. I will spend a week on one of these foundations...maybe more. So much to consider and SO affected by slope and soil properties.