fuentes
Structural
- Sep 23, 2005
- 1
Wright and Reese (1978) ( McVay et al., 1994) gives an equation for calculating average skin friction on auger cast piles in sand. The equation reads:
fs = po'Ks tan (phi) =< 1.6 tsf
fs= average skin frictin on pile
Ks= 1.1
tan(phi)= tangent of the internal angle of friction of soil
po'= average effective stress along length of pile
Since my case conforms to a case where a auger cast pile is to be embedded in limestone (non-weathered), whose angle of friction could fluctuate from 35 to 45 degrees, does the equation given by Wright and Reese could correctly approximate the tensional capacity of such a pile? Or the fact that the augering process by itself would tend to smooth out the rock surface to such an extent, that the frictional angle of the rock does not represent the reality at the interface between concrete and rock?
Thanks
Francisco J. Fuentes P.E.
Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department.
fs = po'Ks tan (phi) =< 1.6 tsf
fs= average skin frictin on pile
Ks= 1.1
tan(phi)= tangent of the internal angle of friction of soil
po'= average effective stress along length of pile
Since my case conforms to a case where a auger cast pile is to be embedded in limestone (non-weathered), whose angle of friction could fluctuate from 35 to 45 degrees, does the equation given by Wright and Reese could correctly approximate the tensional capacity of such a pile? Or the fact that the augering process by itself would tend to smooth out the rock surface to such an extent, that the frictional angle of the rock does not represent the reality at the interface between concrete and rock?
Thanks
Francisco J. Fuentes P.E.
Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department.