Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Tension Pile Reinforcing

Status
Not open for further replies.

RonRoberts

Structural
Apr 20, 2001
47
Has anyone addressed the issue of a drilled concrete shaft, highly loaded in tension (tower crane leg uplift) and the type of reinforcing laps required under ACI 318?

Specifically, should a 30 inch diameter drilled shaft, loaded to 1200 kips tension be considered a tension tie, thus requiring mechanical couplers rather than lap splices under ACI 318 Section 12.15.6?

Thanks for the help
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I designed some tension piers for a series of large hold downs for a stay-cable supported roof for a stadium project using belled piers with post-tensioning.

I didn't trust the idea of mild steel for a couple of reasons. One was the required depth of the piers - going down about 80 feet - required a number of lap splices and this made me nervous. I know that a properly designed lap splice theoretically carries the same tensile capacity of the bar itself. The issue was that I just felt better with a redundant system in place in addition to the mild steel.

Second reason was in high tension I felt that the piers would be cracked and allow moisture into the section, possibly deteriorating the mild steel over time - even with epoxy coating.

So we used full depth tendons in the piers, prestressed them such that the concrete would not go into tension.

 
Thanks JAE,

Our situation is a little different, we have an intermitently high tension load of a somewhere between a few minutes and an hour duration probably occuring many times a week over the next 3 years. Corrosion won't be a factor but the presence of a bundled bar lap splice of 100% of the bars, immediately below the pile cap has me concerned.

I found a paper in ACI Structural Journal Nov/Dec 2005 that says that though it's not permitted under ACI 318, it has been done safely (with some constraints such as staggering the splices, and providing quite a bit of transverse reinf.)

I'm search for someone that has found any other research or has experience with that particular issue of treating a tension pile as a tension tie member.
 
Hmm, interesting discussion. We typically don't require anything beyond a lap. But generally don't have very significant tension piles. Though I am just finishing a parking garage project, where some piles have fairly significant tension, up to about 40 kips or so.
 
just bars that go all the way down. with laps of course.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor