salukikev
Mechanical
- May 14, 2008
- 110
So I'm back designing a product for a client and dreading the UL phase we'll eventually get to. I'm always happy to job this out but everyone's always shocked when they get the tab from UL. I can understand a reasonable fee for testing services, that's all well & good (definition of "reasonable" notwithstanding). What kind of gets me is the published standards that they make you buy if you want to try to comply early on. Is it really fair to charge $500+ each time an engineer wants to review their list of standards? (which is about as fun as reading through a 100pg EULA in detail). Then, if you find your document isn't really the most applicable, you have to go buy another one.
I'm all for everybody making a fair profit for services here, but I feel like there should be a more appropriate process with more emphasis on safety and less emphasis on profits. Maybe a subscription? So you could pay for 30 days of access to unlimited documents? I guess everyone would just save the whole library then, huh? Anyway, I'm not sure if this is ending up more of a rant than the constructive criticism I intended, but every time I have to deal with UL I end up with this sort of dialogue in my head. Any suggestions to making this headache more palatable are welcomed!
I'm all for everybody making a fair profit for services here, but I feel like there should be a more appropriate process with more emphasis on safety and less emphasis on profits. Maybe a subscription? So you could pay for 30 days of access to unlimited documents? I guess everyone would just save the whole library then, huh? Anyway, I'm not sure if this is ending up more of a rant than the constructive criticism I intended, but every time I have to deal with UL I end up with this sort of dialogue in my head. Any suggestions to making this headache more palatable are welcomed!