Drej
Mechanical
- Jul 31, 2002
- 971
Guys,
I'm undertaking a sequentially coupled steady state thermal stress analysis of a simple square plate, using DS4 elements in the thermal run and S4R elements in the thermal stress. This problem has a closed form solution. I have carried out the analysis using standard SI units (kg-m-s) and the answer I get ties perfectly with closed form. Tick in the box.
However, I need to run this model in units of (mm-tonnes-s) and when I convert my model, the answer just isn't 'correct'. The mm-tonne-s model I use has been converted to mm dimensions, and I have converted the units correctly, or so I think, since I have produced the same model in ANSYS - using the same unit conversion of mm-tonne-s, which gives the correct solution. Mind-boggling.
There is significantly more displacement in the tonne-mm-s Abaqus model, which gives rises to significantly greater stresses.
Anyone ever come across this? Any thoughts?
------------
See faq569-1083 for details on how to make best use of Eng-Tips.com
I'm undertaking a sequentially coupled steady state thermal stress analysis of a simple square plate, using DS4 elements in the thermal run and S4R elements in the thermal stress. This problem has a closed form solution. I have carried out the analysis using standard SI units (kg-m-s) and the answer I get ties perfectly with closed form. Tick in the box.
However, I need to run this model in units of (mm-tonnes-s) and when I convert my model, the answer just isn't 'correct'. The mm-tonne-s model I use has been converted to mm dimensions, and I have converted the units correctly, or so I think, since I have produced the same model in ANSYS - using the same unit conversion of mm-tonne-s, which gives the correct solution. Mind-boggling.
There is significantly more displacement in the tonne-mm-s Abaqus model, which gives rises to significantly greater stresses.
Anyone ever come across this? Any thoughts?
------------
See faq569-1083 for details on how to make best use of Eng-Tips.com