haynewp
Structural
- Dec 13, 2000
- 2,327
I wanted see what members here are using for tilt-up panel base connections. I have seen probably hundreds of drawings that show a typical tilt-up panel that is doweled into an adjacent pour strip and simply rests on top of a continuous footing. I started thinking about this detail the other day, particularly for high seismic areas. I am not really sure exactly what IBC/ACI intends the connection to be for tilt up panels to resist seismic.
But in general, even in non-seismic areas, it appears that engineers are either:
1. Counting on the in plane wall shear to be transferred through the rebar dowels from the wall into the pour strip
2. Relying on friction between the bottom of the panel and the top of the footing to take out the shear.
I don't think I agree with the first option, because the adjacent slab may be directly on top of a vapor barrier AND it looks like they are counting on the rebar itself to transfer shear. (Unless they are somehow justifying shear friction, but there is no intentionally roughened surface??)
I guess you could justify the second option under most cases, but I for some reason don't feel comfortable with it for high seismic.
One of the only things that I found on code requirements is this:
Which seems to be using the same concept of transferring shear through the dowels, the only difference is it also requires additional dowels going from the footing into the pour strip.
I know how to solve all of this by using embed plates and anchors into the footing. I am just looking for a discussion on this dowel into pour strip/dowel into footing stuff in high seismic areas or just using friction at the base of the panel in low seisimc areas.
But in general, even in non-seismic areas, it appears that engineers are either:
1. Counting on the in plane wall shear to be transferred through the rebar dowels from the wall into the pour strip
2. Relying on friction between the bottom of the panel and the top of the footing to take out the shear.
I don't think I agree with the first option, because the adjacent slab may be directly on top of a vapor barrier AND it looks like they are counting on the rebar itself to transfer shear. (Unless they are somehow justifying shear friction, but there is no intentionally roughened surface??)
I guess you could justify the second option under most cases, but I for some reason don't feel comfortable with it for high seismic.
One of the only things that I found on code requirements is this:
Which seems to be using the same concept of transferring shear through the dowels, the only difference is it also requires additional dowels going from the footing into the pour strip.
I know how to solve all of this by using embed plates and anchors into the footing. I am just looking for a discussion on this dowel into pour strip/dowel into footing stuff in high seismic areas or just using friction at the base of the panel in low seisimc areas.