rashid_UK
Electrical
- Nov 21, 2016
- 5
Hi all,
I have been reading technical literature on transformer differential and am having difficulty visualizing why some of the values are what they are, I would be grateful for any comments from members or pointers to good reference material to aid my understanding.
My understanding is that the protection scheme compares the load current to differential current flow and will find the ratio.
A typical differential scheme will have a number of sections:
First section - allows for differential current due to tap change + CT transformation error + magnetizing current + Relay error
Second section - slope of X% which starts at say 0.5 * Iprim to say 2 * Iprim
Thank you
I have been reading technical literature on transformer differential and am having difficulty visualizing why some of the values are what they are, I would be grateful for any comments from members or pointers to good reference material to aid my understanding.
My understanding is that the protection scheme compares the load current to differential current flow and will find the ratio.
A typical differential scheme will have a number of sections:
First section - allows for differential current due to tap change + CT transformation error + magnetizing current + Relay error
Second section - slope of X% which starts at say 0.5 * Iprim to say 2 * Iprim
Q: If we decrease the slope end point from 2*Iprim we will make protection somewhat more stable for out of zone faults because we increase the restraint area.
Q: What is the reasoning behind the number choosing a value around 1 - 2? (I understand it can be set much higher if required but would like to know why these values are typical, is it because the transformer could see 2 times FLC in am=n extreme case?)
Q: The slope of the line, should this be the same % allowed as for the % of primary current allowed in the first section (Tap+CT+Relay error) because the differential error current will increase somewhat proportionally as the load increases?
Slope of second line - Setting this to 100% allow out of zone faults near transformer to pass through without issue and allow for CT saturation. There is a Highset Stage that can be set which will clip the restrained area at a X A (80 - 100% of max primary theoretical fault current) I see quoted in some application guides.
Q: Is it not better to leave the slope continuous without a High-Set stage as defining a value here will greatly increase the possibility of a trip for out of zone faults?Thank you