PatBethea
Mechanical
- Nov 16, 2006
- 142
I've got steel trusses currently sitting on top of a concrete header. The trusses span 60 feet. The roof is curved. The bottom chords of the trusses are 4" channel oriented so that they are sitting on their 'legs'. The bottom chord currently rests on the concrete header - the two are not connected.
I had a SE design a new steel beam and column system, but he failed to address the connection of trusses to the beam. According to his numbers there is an approximate 7300 lb uplift reaction per truss while the deadload is about 5300 lb. Two-thousand pounds of force isn't much to counter. I figure I can just run a fillet weld down one side of the truss (the beam has a 10" flange)and be done with it - the only shear should be from thermal expansion.
Is there anything else to consider? What bothers me is the fact that the truss is not currently connected to the header. The building was constructed in 1927 and I realize they didn't have the same building requirements, but is there another reason why the truss would be allowed to 'float'?
I had a SE design a new steel beam and column system, but he failed to address the connection of trusses to the beam. According to his numbers there is an approximate 7300 lb uplift reaction per truss while the deadload is about 5300 lb. Two-thousand pounds of force isn't much to counter. I figure I can just run a fillet weld down one side of the truss (the beam has a 10" flange)and be done with it - the only shear should be from thermal expansion.
Is there anything else to consider? What bothers me is the fact that the truss is not currently connected to the header. The building was constructed in 1927 and I realize they didn't have the same building requirements, but is there another reason why the truss would be allowed to 'float'?