electricpete
Electrical
- May 4, 2001
- 16,774
1 - Can anyone suggest a formula or reference for computing the total radial forces induction motor rotor in the presence of static eccentricity… as a function of air gap geometry, flux density and number of poles? I believe there is a 2xLF and a constant (zero-hz) component.
Or…
2 - can you explain the following statement from EASA Principles of Large AC Motors: “The magnitude of the twice line frequency forces in inversly proportional to the 4th power of the number of electrical poles. Thus, a four-pole motor would have only one-sixteenth the exciting force of a 2-pole motor”. [it is not clear whether this assumes eccentricity or is merely discussing the distoring force applied at equal/opposite points on the stator which creates no net rotor force unless there is eccentricity].
I am somewhat at a loss to understand why the 2-pole motor forces are often presented as being larger than higher-pole motors. I understand the difference in stiffness of stator to the 2-pole mode shape, but that should affect the vibration response, not the exciting force. Or is it perhaps the distortion of the airgap that increases the local flux that in turn increases the original magnetic distorting force?…. still in that case it is not obvious where the F~(1/p)^4 would come from.
Any thoughts?
Or…
2 - can you explain the following statement from EASA Principles of Large AC Motors: “The magnitude of the twice line frequency forces in inversly proportional to the 4th power of the number of electrical poles. Thus, a four-pole motor would have only one-sixteenth the exciting force of a 2-pole motor”. [it is not clear whether this assumes eccentricity or is merely discussing the distoring force applied at equal/opposite points on the stator which creates no net rotor force unless there is eccentricity].
I am somewhat at a loss to understand why the 2-pole motor forces are often presented as being larger than higher-pole motors. I understand the difference in stiffness of stator to the 2-pole mode shape, but that should affect the vibration response, not the exciting force. Or is it perhaps the distortion of the airgap that increases the local flux that in turn increases the original magnetic distorting force?…. still in that case it is not obvious where the F~(1/p)^4 would come from.
Any thoughts?