Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Unconfined Compressive Strength(UCS) for stabilised subbase materials

Status
Not open for further replies.

defg

Structural
Jul 7, 2006
55
I'm carrying out cement stabilization on different gavel materials for use as stabilised subbase C1 by using different percentage of cement.The percentages used are 2.5%,3% and 3.5% of cement.The moulded specimens were cured for seven days in a water tight plastic bags and immensed in a water bath of a constant temperature of 25centigrades.The samples were then soaked in water fopr four hours prior to crushing.The very interesting phenomena here it that the test results show that the 2.5%of cement gave better strength than 3%cement. We have tried to repeat the tests precisely,but we have got the same results.According to my experience I could hope that the higher the cement the higher the strength to be achieved!What is the reasons for this!
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

With such low cement contents, cement distribution within the sample is a problem. Sometimes the distribution is good and you get good strength...sometimes it's not so good (inadequate mixing) and the strength suffers.
 
One case: The optimum of strength per dollar of mixed cement/soil was around 5-6% by dry weight for well graded granular soil with less than 6% passing #200 sieve. (75% portland & 25% flyash in Rita Ranch of Tucson, AZ).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor