dursunlutfu
Structural
- Jun 9, 2018
- 47
Hello Folks,
I am working on an addition to a 1-story wood framed building. I have no information regarding the existing foundation but I am assuming that there is a conventional continuous footing along the perimeter wall of the house. I was proposing to underpin the assumed conventional footing with square pads where there are new introduced point loads coming from the addition of the house to the existing wood sill plate (5kips-6kips). Due to architectural issues (ripping off terrezano floor) , the client does not want to go with that option. Since I have no soils report and info about the foundation, I thought that would be the safest and the most logical option. Would you guys assume the "assumed" existing footing as sufficient or not in this kind of a case ?
Thank you for your time and energy!
I am working on an addition to a 1-story wood framed building. I have no information regarding the existing foundation but I am assuming that there is a conventional continuous footing along the perimeter wall of the house. I was proposing to underpin the assumed conventional footing with square pads where there are new introduced point loads coming from the addition of the house to the existing wood sill plate (5kips-6kips). Due to architectural issues (ripping off terrezano floor) , the client does not want to go with that option. Since I have no soils report and info about the foundation, I thought that would be the safest and the most logical option. Would you guys assume the "assumed" existing footing as sufficient or not in this kind of a case ?
Thank you for your time and energy!