Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

US REFINERIES CANNOT PROCESS LITE OIL 1

1503-44

Petroleum
Jul 15, 2019
6,660
The thing I keep seeing on you tube is that US refineries must export light shale oil to refine it in other countries. I have discussed this at length with several AI LLMs delving quite deeply into process constraints of various refinery configurations and in general this does not appear to be true. I am ready to call out their BS, but I am not a refining process engineer, so I am interested in some human confirmation.
What I have learned, or cleverly convinced every LLM I have conversed with to agree upon is,
That after one gets past a basic topping plant, refineries seem to have a basic configuration that enables them to process blends of crude oils preferably within an average range of API 30-35-40.
Researching many flavors of crude oil, I see that most readily available blends range from a low of API 20, WCS West Canadian Select, Hebron at 21.2t to a Bakken Crude at 43.8, DOMS Domestic Sweet 42.9 and finally WTI-LT West Texas Intermediate Light at API 47.5. At the extreme to provide contrast, I see one from Malaysia at API 73, actually a condensate stream.
Noting that all those blends have at least some amount of boil off between the entire range of 15C and 550C, any refinery running any of those, or blends of those blends, must be able to process all those components to some degree, whether that means additional treatment and further separation, or just making wide cuts. You get a little or a lot of each product, depending on the distillation curve. It's all gotta go somewhere. So it appears to me that a typical refinery can at the least process all oil it is feed over the entire API and temperature range 15 to 550C. I understand that quality of some products might be affected by poor number of trays and spacing and lack of good temperature control at extreme limits, but in general can we expect to get some amount of Lt Naphtha, Hvy Naphtha, Kerosene, Gasoil, and if there is a vacuum tower, vacuum distillate and residue from any blend feedstock? The amount you get of each may not be ideal, or most profitable, but that's what you get. Whether you can improve on those by further treating depends on the additional process that the refinery has at its disposal. I see a lot of similarity there as well.
That kind of leaves me to believe that those additional units can adjust the final output breaking down some heavies and adding lites to others to get more or less of one product or another another, rather than selling all as a lower value product, but essentially that is just improving what has already been essentially "processed" already.
So to wrap this up, my conclusion is that American refineries can process any common blend between API 30 and perhaps up to 45, some blends, or refineries doing so, more effeciently than others. Several large refineries have been upgraded to very profitably do so. So, I know it's possible. Outside those ranges, blending to get the average API back to acceptable range is profitable, but not totally necessary until you get into a condensate API. Over 50? And, IF The US exports light oil to be refined elsewhere, that is because of economics. WTI has been selling below Brent price for years. I would suppose the discount is to enable foreign refineries to have the option to buy it and refine that rather than Brent. In other words pretty much why Gulf coast refineries get a "good price" for Mexico Maya blend, so they have the option to buy that rather than the "good price" they get for Canadian WCS. Every oil must be sold at Par value at any potential purchaser's location, or they buy the other option and any "discount" is for transport cost and the sellers desire to ensure his sale at auction over that of other suppliers. That also pretty much refutes the generally prevailing Canadian idea that the US buys their oil unfairly cheap. Today WCS is $10 lower than WTI instead of the usual $13 to $15, which tells me that there is a bit more demand for it, or the sellers are justifying their pride in WCS somehow, but siince it costs $6 to $8 to get it to the Gulf, it will not get any better than WTI - 10, or the refineries will just buy WTI. The only fair price is market price and the market price is the fair price. You want a higher price, then you remove the heavy metals then bring it to me.

Ultimate conclusion. It's only a matter of making profit. American refineries can refine American oil, they just chose to blend with heavier foreign oils because they get more fuel and bunker oil, without sacrificing diesel, gasoline and kerosene output needed for demand; which making too much of it would only lower those prices. You get a full bouquet for every barrel processed. Why settle for making too much gasoline diesel and jet fuel and kill your market? Phew. Done.

Comments?
I think these LLMs have gotten very much better over the last 6 months, but perhaps we both will judge that by the accuracy of my conclusion.


My LLM comments.
Gemini reports are extensive, if not overly so. I found it a bit difficult to agree on its research planning, but it does an extensive internet search. I told it to delete the what is API and oil flavors it wanted to do, but it did it anyway. It did reach out to 134 websites for one report I asked for.

Leo is built into Brave Browser. It's a more natural conversation process. Not bad. And very convenient sitting right there on the browser. Gives you an "Answer with AI" prompt for anything you search for, or any question you care to ask it at the moment. I really like that.

I wasn't happy with ChatGPT. It doesn't like to do too much work.
 
Last edited:
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

If anyone is interested, this video explains the various crude benchmark futures price spreads and their relationships to their geographic delivery points and transportation costs.

I am not sure what process engineering expertise he has, but he does mention that a Shell refinery in Mississippi can process light oil, but at an apparent undesirable loss of "efficiency". That at least fits "my theory".
The You Tube videos do not make it clear that any refinery can process light oil and it is a matter of running any given blend effeciently enough to make a profit is the reason they chose to, or not to, run one blend over any other, or to make a better blend by mixing in a heavy stock that they can buy cheaply and sweeten the profits from that.

 
Last edited:
Mr 44, You live! I hadn't seen you on these pages for a while.

Refining is a finely tuned business which generally doesn't make much money but is a necessary part of the product delivery mechanism.

So yes, you can refine virtually anything, but if you run into a bottleneck on any one fluid then that limits your total throughput to less than 80-90% of name plate then you're simply running at a loss.

API is a pretty Crude (pun intended) appreciation of what a Crude spread is in terms of composition and output.

Of course local demand profile needs to be considered as well to avoid shipping loads of product around, especially the bottom end stuff. not sure the AI models will find all that out and stitch it together.

So yes "can't refine" or "must send it away", is a bit simplistic, but easier that the fuller explanation, but I think most people would understand - we can't refine this economically / loose money therefore we need to ship it out. Changing the refinery to do it better will just cost too much and not guaranteed to pay it back if the feed stock changes again after 5 years.
 
Yes, still having fun. Extremely happy I am living here. I turned off the USA news feeds and I've been working, more on my paintings. With the long holidays here running into January, several of the better fiestas in late Jan and early Carnival, time goes into warp drive. I have also been working on a few paintings. I did one about 5 times before I was happy with the results.

Turning off the TV news, I found there is some pretty interesting stuff on YouTube and I kept seeing this theme. Its been bothering me too much. I don't like technical errors being propigated by "internet experts". It dumbs down the entire planet if we let it go. I guess I feel some responsibility, if I don't do something to prevent that, as obviously it sure ain't getting better on its own. It's a race to the bottom. This theme was especially annoying. I floated the theory on one website a drilling completion engineer - now convenience store owner (?) does live shows mostly about political stuff bull shit, punctured with occasionally serious blurbs concerning general oil and gas topics, which is usually limited to the price of petrol this coming summer. He didn't get it. Then he says there's lots of guys in one branch of the business that claim to know a lot about stuff in other areas, but it isn't true and you shouldn't listen to them. Ha ha. I took it as a challenge. And here we are.

Right, as you know, the API of a blend is the average of the full stream and is far from the actual distribution of compounds. You can be full of heavies and lights with nothing in the middle, but real crudes always seem to have a pretty smooth curve between the min and max gravities of compounds in the makeup. In any case, I have collected the actual assays of a hundred or so oil fields and primary benchmark crudes and they all exhibit smooth curves. Which is how I came to that conclusion. You knock out the meth and LPGs until you get to C5, then run it into the atmospheric distill column and process everything else with vacuum tower Hydrotreating, reforming, crackers to further split down the heavy end inti real heavies and stuff you can reform, or build up some of the lights to make what you want, or you leave them as is with wide cuts of poorer quality, but what goes in, which is the full stream, comes out one way or another. Technically it has been processed. So that finishes point #1.

There are several very large refineries that have updated to process a wide range of blends very efficiently, so we know that's possible, but it's a business case decision more related to using the cheapest, most reliably supplied feedstocks that you can get your hands on in your own neck of the woods, or beachfront, as the case may be. It would not make a lot sense for a refinery in San Francisco to optimize for WTI, when they have a cheap heavy local source, or the remaining flow from Alaska. A refinery in Houston with a reliable heavy feed from a company owned and operated source in Guyana might not be all that interested in adding WTI, whereas a refinery across the road with a dwindling heavy supply from Mexico now subject to tariffs, might think about running more WTI. As we rather abruptly found out, sometimes things change overnight. However the US political theme of "energy independence" does not allow some to believe that Economics 101 takes precedence over political ideology, especially in the extreme capitalistic society they have CREATED, and even they refuse its allowed that SaudiAramco owns the largest refinery in the US and likes to import Saudi blends to run it. So they invent stories about how US refineries HAVE TO DO IT, because otherwise, maybe it's unthinkable. I just want to show them, hey, it's the beast you created that runs the country. They do it, not because they have to, it's because they want to.

So, it's the personal challenge I want to respond to with confidence, plus the faulty technical perceptions I want to try to correct. Sometimes the engineer in me leaves me no other choice. Gotta make it right. Right?

Thanks for answering. 👍
Things OK up there?
I found 10 St George Dragon 1£ coins I had collected 11 freaking years ago now. Thought about all you guys.
This website looks too much like real work. 👎
 
Yes, pretty good. About to build a house this year so nearly pressing go. Scary stuff.

The new site take s but if getting used to but works just the same and you can clear it all from new posts with just a couple of clicks. Not many use the DM feature or the other social media gumf.

Glad it's going well and agree, a lot of these YT merchants haven't got a clue and don't even try and find out.

Stay safe and painting. We'll get there some day soon.....
 
You are going to be BUSY.

I just don't like the looks of this site.
Just another Google document.
 

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor