Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

utility connector question on P&ID

Status
Not open for further replies.

hswang2

Civil/Environmental
Oct 27, 2006
53
Fig1 .Pump discharge fluid is acetic acid . and utility connection is nitrogen/service water.

Fig2. The process line is nonyl phenol exthoxylate and utility connection is nitrogen/service water.
(Please see attached file)



My question is why the utility connection in fig 1 have no spectacle blind like figure 2.

I know that there may be the two reasons to put spectacle blind (1). The process line is easy to leak or highly Explosive / (2) The process is batch not continuous.(3) higher design pressure

But this seems not fit the above requirement. Please help me out.

Thank you very much.

 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

For environental reasons, both bleeder valves should be plugged.
Check valves are not effective.
Hose connectors with plug are easily available.
I can't think of a reason to blind figure2 other than odor prevention.
 
Spec blinds are normally used in those type applications to prevent back flow into the utility header. I would guess that the utility on Fig 1 gets used much more frequently than Fig 2 and so the blind has been removed for ease of operability.
 
I have read that even block valves are not "OK" for long term process isolation. If it is perceived that one will not use a line for a long long time, a spec blind is a very secure way to isolate the process and prevent leaking. If the connection is to be used "rarely", then a spec blind may be called for depending on how hazardous the process fluid is, similar to what ash9144 said.

Hope this helps.

Onwards,

Matt
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor