Yobbo
Mechanical
- Apr 22, 2003
- 85
Dear Readers,
I am aware that my question may be on the threshold of control engineering and mechanical engineering, but I give it a try anyway. For a flow control of natural gas I need to create a situation, where the controllability is high. With that in mind I am opting for a valve position control solution, where a fine and a coarse valve are parallely connected and where the attached control scheme is being applied. The principle is that the fine valve will be able to control small deviations from the set point, whereas the coarse valve will lag behind with a integrator-only controller when deviations persist and cannot be corrected by the fine valve alone. This way the coarse valve will provide the base load and the fine valve will take care of small disturbances. The integrator-only controller must be provided with anti-windup facility, so that when the output of the integrator-only controller will stop integrating when the output has either reached 0% or 100%. For manual control it should be available as well.
The question is how I should determine the ratio of the size or capacity ( Cv or Kv value) over the coarse and the fine valve. Intuitively I would think of resp. 75% and 25%, but there may be criteria or guide lines, that I do not know of now, but that might help me make this choice.
I would be thankfull for any suggestions about either where to search for them or how to actually determine this ratio.
With best regards I remain,
Karel Postulart
Karel Postulart, The Netherlands
Nuon Power Generation
I am aware that my question may be on the threshold of control engineering and mechanical engineering, but I give it a try anyway. For a flow control of natural gas I need to create a situation, where the controllability is high. With that in mind I am opting for a valve position control solution, where a fine and a coarse valve are parallely connected and where the attached control scheme is being applied. The principle is that the fine valve will be able to control small deviations from the set point, whereas the coarse valve will lag behind with a integrator-only controller when deviations persist and cannot be corrected by the fine valve alone. This way the coarse valve will provide the base load and the fine valve will take care of small disturbances. The integrator-only controller must be provided with anti-windup facility, so that when the output of the integrator-only controller will stop integrating when the output has either reached 0% or 100%. For manual control it should be available as well.
The question is how I should determine the ratio of the size or capacity ( Cv or Kv value) over the coarse and the fine valve. Intuitively I would think of resp. 75% and 25%, but there may be criteria or guide lines, that I do not know of now, but that might help me make this choice.
I would be thankfull for any suggestions about either where to search for them or how to actually determine this ratio.
With best regards I remain,
Karel Postulart
Karel Postulart, The Netherlands
Nuon Power Generation