bmoorthy
Mechanical
- May 29, 2003
- 457
Understand that the Top sides of the Offshore platform piping systems generally under go a sensitive leak test prior to commissioning.
Some operators insist this has to be done using helium traser. Some ask for testing at 1.1 times the line pressure and some ask for 0.9 time the line pressure and some at operating pressre. But the testing is undertakne. only the pressure varies.
This is the undertaken by Shell, Exon, BP and other operators.
Questions:
1) Out of 100 valves taken at random (Assuming that the manufacturer has fully tested to API/ANSI B16.34 et al) produced to general specification (not specifically designed for fugitive levels), how many valve may leak when subjected to sensitive leak test (From Stem packing/Gland packing area), what has been the past record in this aspect?
2)Is it that "it is not worth specifying in the general valve specification that the valves have to meet the final sensitive leak test requirement or at least specify a TYPE test kind of requirement, since the number of valves that might really pose problem and cost of repair/Replacement during the final commissioning and during operation are much less as compared to procuring the valves that would be tested for Helium presssure test"?
3) During the hazop studies, is this a point a standard agenda or is this an unknown risk?
4) Is there a international standard that has published the thresold leakage rate that is tolerable during the operations for a given fluid?
5) How is the acceptance criteria for Fugitive leakage rate established? Is that the threshold leakage rate in unit space divided by number of leakage paths minus some factor of safety?
Some operators insist this has to be done using helium traser. Some ask for testing at 1.1 times the line pressure and some ask for 0.9 time the line pressure and some at operating pressre. But the testing is undertakne. only the pressure varies.
This is the undertaken by Shell, Exon, BP and other operators.
Questions:
1) Out of 100 valves taken at random (Assuming that the manufacturer has fully tested to API/ANSI B16.34 et al) produced to general specification (not specifically designed for fugitive levels), how many valve may leak when subjected to sensitive leak test (From Stem packing/Gland packing area), what has been the past record in this aspect?
2)Is it that "it is not worth specifying in the general valve specification that the valves have to meet the final sensitive leak test requirement or at least specify a TYPE test kind of requirement, since the number of valves that might really pose problem and cost of repair/Replacement during the final commissioning and during operation are much less as compared to procuring the valves that would be tested for Helium presssure test"?
3) During the hazop studies, is this a point a standard agenda or is this an unknown risk?
4) Is there a international standard that has published the thresold leakage rate that is tolerable during the operations for a given fluid?
5) How is the acceptance criteria for Fugitive leakage rate established? Is that the threshold leakage rate in unit space divided by number of leakage paths minus some factor of safety?