Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations pierreick on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Vessel and Head Weights

Status
Not open for further replies.

rick44028

Petroleum
Jan 30, 2002
5
I have been using a formula for finding the weight of a vessel, Wt.(lbs)=A(40.8)t; where A=surface area (Sq. Ft.)
t=thickness of shell in inches
40.8= density of steel (lbs/in/sq.ft.)

I have seen a reference to using 41.15 instead of 40.8

Can anyone help me refind the reference

Thanks
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

40.8psf/in is correct for steel.
I have never seen the 41.15psf/in used.
Possiblilties for the larger number:
1. Slightly higher wt is used for ss if you are using warehouse billing wts for ss.
2. The user has included extra for mill overtolerance.
3. If for formed heads, manufacturer may include factor based upon experience.

You are accurate if you calculate weights of components based upon actual wts & the 40.8psf/in for plates + a nominal allowance (say 5%-10%) to account for mill/part overtolerance, welds, paint, + misc small items for which it is a waste of time to add (i.e., small couplings, bolts, gaskets, etc.)
 
Your second figure is close to what I currently adopt for austenitic stainless steels: in SI 7850 kg/m3 for carbon steel and 8000 kg/m3 for austenitic ss.
prex
motori@xcalcsREMOVE.com
Online tools for structural design
 
The difference is in the material. Carbon steel factors to 0.2833 lbs/in3 (40.8 lbs/ft3). Stainless steel is 0.2857 lbs/in3 (41.1408 lbs/ft3).
Weight CS: Length x width x thick x 0.2833
Weight SS: length x width x thick x 0.2857
(Above in US units)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor