Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

VFD in open loop control - conceptual question 7

Status
Not open for further replies.

PaulKraemer

Electrical
Jan 13, 2012
145
Hi,

I am trying to troubleshoot a problem on a printing press which has a variable frequency drive that controls an AC Motor that drives the main drive shaft for the press. This shaft drives all of the driven rolls on the press. The speed reference for the drive is set by a potentiometer (pot) that is wired to an analog input on the drive. There is no encoder or other type of speed sensor wired to the drive.

Anyway, this press (and the drive system), has worked fine for many years. Recently, we have started having an issue where initially, we set the pot so that the press runs at our desired speed. It runs at this speed for 5-10 minutes, but then without changing the pot, the drive starts to gradually slow down. After about 15 minutes, it is about 50% of its original speed.

The drive is an ABB ACS 601. I have been in touch with ABB tech support and they have asked me to check a few things. There are read only parameters that allow you to monitor measured motor current and calculated torque. The displayed values fluctuate rapidly, with the current ranging between 13-15 amps and the torque between 25-30%, but I see no noticeable change in these when we experience our gradual slowdowns. I monitored the 0-10V signal from my pot to the analog input to verify that this does not decrease. I also monitored the output to the motor, setting my meter to display AC voltage and frequency. The AC voltage was very steady at 115 VAC and I saw no gradual decline in this. The frequency fluctuated rapidly between 350-450 Hz, but I never monitored frequency from a VFD like this before. Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe these drives operate at a high carrier frequency in the way that they use a DC bus to create/simulate an AC sine wave at the desired frequency. When I try to monitor this with my meter, I wonder if the meter is thrown off by the high carrier frequency combined with the simulated AC sine wave frequency. In any event, even though my measured frequency did fluctuate quite a bit, I saw no change in this as we experienced our gradual slowdown.

I will continue to follow up with ABB, but I wonder if anyone here can help me get a better conceptual understanding of what I am dealing with. My understanding is that a typical VFD varies both voltage and frequency linear fashion, with higher voltage and higher frequency resulting in faster speeds. Considering that our drive does not make use of an encoder or other type of speed sensor, I would consider this open loop control. I would assume that there is a more or less linear relationship between the analog input from my pot (0-10 VDC) to both voltage and frequency. If I adjust my pot to get the speed I want and don't touch it, I assume that the drive will put out a fixed voltage at a fixed frequency (Voltage A at Frequency A). What confuses me is, what happens if the load changes? For example, if Voltage A at Frequency A results in Speed A at Load A, what would I expect if the load increases. Would I expect the Speed to decrease? Or is a typical VFD without a speed sensor able to detect this situation and compensate to keep speed constant?

I am just wondering if something mechanical is going on that is causing the load to increase over time (maybe as a component heats up), and if this is the case, does our drive have the capability to compensate for this or would a slowdown be expected. If load was increasing, my gut feeling is that I would see increases in current and torque, but I am not entirely sure about this. Also, as this drive system is pulling a web (paper) through the printing press, I would think a load increase would lead to increased tension on the web, but I see no sign of this.

Any input will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance,
Paul



 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Your observations are correct and your conclusions are correct.

A load/torque increase seems out of the question. And you are right that voltage/speed ratio is roughly constant. Except for low speeds where the boost (increase in V/Hz) sets in to compensate for resistive voltage drops.

To me, it seems that there is a problem with the motor itself. The squirrel cage may experience thermal expansion, which results in rotor bars losing contact with the shorting ring with increased rotor impedance and increased slip as a result. Did you notice if there is ayn unusual heat in the motor when speed drops?

Anyhow, if frequency stays OK and speed drops, then I would try a new motor.

Gunnar Englund
--------------------------------------
Half full - Half empty? I don't mind. It's what in it that counts.
 
When something like this happens gradually over a long time, I’ve seen be the result of failing conductor insulation. Over time, the corona discharge effect from standing waves taking place between conductors (phase to phase, not phase to ground) results in pin holes between two conductors, especially where they touch each other. This results micro spikes in current, often too fast to be displayed, but the current-limit functioning of the drive output is seeing it and reducing the frequency in an attempt to shed load and maintain the current limit setting.


" We are all here on earth to help others; what on earth the others are here for I don't know." -- W. H. Auden
 
Will that show up in a megger test, Jeff or do you need higher than 1000 VDC to detect the failing insulation. Thanks.

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter
 
Bill

Surge comparison test is the best for testing turn to turn and phase to phase insulation. Megger is mainly for groundwall insulation.

Muthu
 
A PD test would show that. Or a Baker test.
But this doesn't seem plausible. If the VFD can sense the extra current and also react to it, then it should show in the display. And the countermeasures, like decreasing frequency or reducing voltage, should also be visible in the display. None of those are seen.
The fluctuating frequency (350-450 Hz measured) is a consequence of PWM and can not be trusted. You need a low-pass filter or an FFT analyser to be able to read the motor frequency reliably.

Gunnar Englund
--------------------------------------
Half full - Half empty? I don't mind. It's what in it that counts.
 

Is this an AC commutator motor?, I often see this behavior when the brushes and or the commutator are worn.

Chuck
 
Ah, an old Schrage motor! If the press is an old one where the brushes have been locked and speed set with a VFD instead? That is an interesting thought. Are such machines still being built? My last one was in the seventies.

But I doubt that. Insulation systems were not built for PWM and such a combination would not last long. I guess months.

Gunnar Englund
--------------------------------------
Half full - Half empty? I don't mind. It's what in it that counts.
 

Oops!, sorry for having my head surrounded by the sphincter muscle. Good point Sir!

Chuck
 
Hi Gunnar, Chuck, Muthu, Bill, JRaef, and anyone I missed - I appreciate your help with this and sorry I took so long to follow up. I was side-tracked by an unrelated, more urgent issue.

Since my initial post (without my assistance), the press operators found a few things. First, I should mention that the press I was struggling with is one of two presses that are positioned side by side. They can be configured either as single, independent, standalone presses, or they can be configured to work together in a dual-press mode for multi-layer products where one press prints one thing on one web after which turn-bars and an idler bridge are used to direct this web into the other press to form a multi-layer, laminated product.

The drive/press that I was struggling with is the Master Drive/Press in the dual-press, multi-layer mode. The operators found that the problem I described (gradual slowdown over time) would only appear in dual press mode. This seemed strange to me because as far as I could tell, this Master Drive gets its speed reference from a potentiometer. It has no idea (control wise) that another press is following it. I couldn't understand why if there was an issue with the motor, why this wouldn't be evident in single press mode as well as dual press mode. The only difference I could see is that in dual press mode, the drive is pulling a heavier, more complicated web.

Anyway, an experienced operator checked out the machine and found out that the drive belt was loose. I guess with the lighter load in single press mode, the belt wouldn't slip. With the heavier load in dual press mode, it did slip. I don't fully understand why the belt would provide better traction (less slippage) when we started out cold and that the slippage would gradually increase over time as we ran, but it seems like this is what was happening. After the belt has been tightened, the press is running great in both dual press and single press mode.

Thank you all again for your help with this. I really appreciate it.

Best regards,
Paul


 
So the motor was not slowing down but the machine was slowing down.


Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter
 
I once replaced a diesel engine that was powering a portable rock crusher with an electric motor and VFD. The engine turned a flywheel pulley which had multiple belts driving various parts of the machine. All I was doing was attaching the old engine drive shaft to the electric motor shaft. I ran all of the mechanical speed / torque numbers and determined that at the reduced speed it was designed to run at, I needed a 250HP motor and drive. At start-up it appeared to work, but in a few minutes it was noticeably slower, then the machine speed kept dropping and dropping. No faults on the drive, nothing appeared wrong other than the slowing speed. Then when smoke started coming from the machine, we figured out that ALL of the belts were slipping. The issue was that the electric motor / VFD provided INSTANT torque, whereas the diesel engine eventually developed it, allowing the belts to keep a better grip. The instant torque made them immediately slip and once that happened, they never fully gripped.


" We are all here on earth to help others; what on earth the others are here for I don't know." -- W. H. Auden
 
That raises an interesting question Jeff.
Can a VFD be tuned to give a design B motor the torque characteristics of a design D motor?

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor